Build Back Better bill and forest funding

Grab your bear can or camp chair, kick your feet up and chew the fat about anything Sierra Nevada related that doesn't quite fit in any of the other forums. Within reason, (and the HST rules and guidelines) this is also an anything goes forum. Tell stories, discuss wilderness issues, music, or whatever else the High Sierra stirs up in your mind.
User avatar
dave54
Founding Member
Posts: 1331
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 10:24 pm
Experience: Level 4 Explorer
Location: where the Sierras, Cascades, and Great Basin meet.

Build Back Better bill and forest funding

Post by dave54 »

The bill provides $450 million for the Legacy Roads and Trail program and $100 million for trail construction and maintenance.
Also several billion for various fuel treatment projects.
The appropriations are spread out over 10 years, so the annual amounts will be 1/10 of those numbers.

The Legacy Roads and Trails program is rehabbing or decommissioning existing roads/trail that are causing environmental problems.

This is the House version. The Senate will pass their own version, and then the two versions must be negotiated to be the same.
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Log off and get outdoors!
~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=
User avatar
rightstar76
Topix Expert
Posts: 776
Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2006 3:22 pm
Experience: N/A

Re: Build Back Better bill and forest funding

Post by rightstar76 »

Dave54, do you think it will have any major impact? Or will it be negligible?
User avatar
dave54
Founding Member
Posts: 1331
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 10:24 pm
Experience: Level 4 Explorer
Location: where the Sierras, Cascades, and Great Basin meet.

Re: Build Back Better bill and forest funding

Post by dave54 »

Too early to tell.
The text of the bill says the funds are to be appropriated now and be available for spending over ten years, so everything gets charged to this year's deficit.
Still requires Congressional approval each year to spend, though. Congress has a poor track record of following its own spending commitments in outyears after the legislation is passed.
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Log off and get outdoors!
~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=
User avatar
rlown
Topix Docent
Posts: 8225
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 5:00 pm
Experience: Level 4 Explorer
Location: Wilton, CA

Re: Build Back Better bill and forest funding

Post by rlown »

But, but, but, we have a 31 Billion surplus in Cali. I want the money back, tax wise. Not to spend on the bullet train.
Time to start actually raking the forests. 3' of duff is way too much. We have seen how that works.
User avatar
BillyBobBurro
Topix Regular
Posts: 118
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 3:57 pm
Experience: N/A

Re: Build Back Better bill and forest funding

Post by BillyBobBurro »

Can you save your "let's go Brandon" bs for facebook?
User avatar
rlown
Topix Docent
Posts: 8225
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 5:00 pm
Experience: Level 4 Explorer
Location: Wilton, CA

Re: Build Back Better bill and forest funding

Post by rlown »

I don't use Fakebook and no. Judging by others sig files don't work yourself into a frenzy. Should have raked the Forest.
User avatar
Bishop_Bob
Topix Regular
Posts: 175
Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2019 11:31 am
Experience: Level 3 Backpacker

Re: Build Back Better bill and forest funding

Post by Bishop_Bob »

this is disgusting
User avatar
TahoeJeff
Topix Fanatic
Posts: 1224
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 11:03 am
Experience: Level 3 Backpacker
Location: South Lake Tahoe, NV

Re: Build Back Better bill and forest funding

Post by TahoeJeff »

Bishop_Bob wrote: Mon Nov 22, 2021 8:13 am this is disgusting
Jeez, lighten up
"A society that puts equality before freedom will get neither. A society that puts freedom before equality will get a high degree of both."

Milton Friedman
User avatar
maverick
Forums Moderator
Forums Moderator
Posts: 11843
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 5:54 pm
Experience: Level 4 Explorer

Re: Build Back Better bill and forest funding

Post by maverick »

Back on topic please.
Professional Sierra Landscape Photographer

I don't give out specific route information, my belief is that it takes away from the whole adventure spirit of a trip, if you need every inch planned out, you'll have to get that from someone else.

Have a safer backcountry experience by using the HST ReConn Form 2.0, named after Larry Conn, a HST member: http://reconn.org
User avatar
creekfeet
Topix Regular
Posts: 157
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2014 11:54 pm
Experience: N/A

Re: Build Back Better bill and forest funding

Post by creekfeet »

rlown wrote: Sun Nov 21, 2021 6:03 pm I don't use Fakebook and no. Judging by others sig files don't work yourself into a frenzy. Should have raked the Forest.
Our of curiosity, what is actually meant by "raking the forest"? Looking at the recent KNP complex fire, it seems like years of vigilant controlled burns in the Giant Forest made a big difference in protecting that portion of the park. However, the Giant Forest features 45 miles of hiking trails that serve as natural firebreaks, and grant safe and easy access for doing controlled burns. It's also one of the most iconic places in the NPS, and therefore it's no-brainer to devote the heavy funds required for controlled burns toward its preservation.

However, in this same fire it appears most of the damage was done in the extremely remote areas around Crystal Cave that only the most hardened cavers and marijuana growers have ever set foot in. It's a topography defined by massive amounts of poison oak, an almost complete lack of surface water, thick vegetation, no trails save for the deteriorating remains of Colony Mill Road, and steep, unforgiving hillsides. I don't see how any preventative measures could have been realistically put in place to spare this area.

I get that better measures can be put in place in CA to lessen to the impact of wildfires on residential areas, but the notion of "raking the forest" strikes me as more of a silly catchphrase than an actual solution to a complex problem.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests