Best Waterfall set up
- pork50
- Topix Acquainted
- Posts: 92
- Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:01 pm
- Experience: N/A
Best Waterfall set up
Exploring with my new point and shoot,
Im wondering what is the best set up to take pictures of waterfalls or of water, yet have the water blurred?
Im wondering what is the best set up to take pictures of waterfalls or of water, yet have the water blurred?
- The Other Tom
- Founding Member
- Posts: 984
- Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 6:06 pm
- Experience: N/A
- Location: Upstate South Carolina
Re: Best Waterfall set up
I don't know what kind of P&S you have, but in general you have to set the shutter speed for a longer exposure to get that blurred water look. Can you do that with your camera ?
There may be other ways I'm not aware of......
There may be other ways I'm not aware of......
- fishmonger
- Topix Fanatic
- Posts: 1250
- Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 10:27 am
- Experience: Level 4 Explorer
- Location: Madison, WI
- Contact:
Re: Best Waterfall set up
a neutral density filter will do wonders - make sure the camera is on low asa so the shutter speed goes up. Tripod mandatory, use slef timer to set it off. If you can't find a matching ND filter, gaffer tape will hold a larger one on the camera.
- pork50
- Topix Acquainted
- Posts: 92
- Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:01 pm
- Experience: N/A
Re: Best Waterfall set up
Other Tom,
Yes I can do that with my camera, hoewever when I set up longer shutter speed, the image reamains quite bright. I tried lowering the F stop to 4.5, but i get a similar result. Anything else to try? Im going to buy some filters like fishmonger suggested.
Yes I can do that with my camera, hoewever when I set up longer shutter speed, the image reamains quite bright. I tried lowering the F stop to 4.5, but i get a similar result. Anything else to try? Im going to buy some filters like fishmonger suggested.
- rlown
- Topix Docent
- Posts: 8224
- Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 5:00 pm
- Experience: Level 4 Explorer
- Location: Wilton, CA
Re: Best Waterfall set up
might just tell us which camera you have. also if you back off your white balance compensation, it won't be too bright, depending on the camera. still trying to figure out how i figured that out on olympus.. :retard: edit: ok it was exposure comp. after I set it to -0.3, pics came out nice, not that it means anything for what your carrying..
- The Other Tom
- Founding Member
- Posts: 984
- Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 6:06 pm
- Experience: N/A
- Location: Upstate South Carolina
Re: Best Waterfall set up
You might try increasing the f stop even more. Ultimately you have to get the right amount of light to the "film". A longer exposure time means the lens opening (apeture) needs to be smaller.pork50 wrote:Other Tom,
Yes I can do that with my camera, hoewever when I set up longer shutter speed, the image reamains quite bright. I tried lowering the F stop to 4.5, but i get a similar result. Anything else to try? Im going to buy some filters like fishmonger suggested.
Fishmonger had a good idea to lower the ASA rating. I hadn't thought of that one.
If the white balance thing doesn't work for you...ever try photoshop (or similar free software, like picasa) ?
- fishmonger
- Topix Fanatic
- Posts: 1250
- Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 10:27 am
- Experience: Level 4 Explorer
- Location: Madison, WI
- Contact:
Re: Best Waterfall set up
since all you need to get the moving water effect is to reduce the amount of light to reach the camera while keeping aperture and sensitivity fixed, you have to cut the light with something like "sunglasses for the lens." If your camera allows you to set the aperture and pick a fixed iso setting (many consumer cameras are auto-ISO and will override your choice once the exposure drops below safe hand holding speed, which would be a show stopper for moving water shots), you are probably ok in overcast lighting, or late in the day, but for sunny days you really need to add something over the lens that takes light away.
An aperture such as F16 or F22 will get you some blur in the water, but on a sunny day, that is barely enough to get the really foggy effect. An 8x ND filter will drop the light 8 f stops without changing the aperture, and without changing color/white balance. That allows you to work in brighter conditions, or use sharper apertures (diffraction causes most lenses to perform best near their brightest apertures - rarely will you see a lens as well a f11 or f16 as it does at F5.6), but don't put too much weight on the sharpness thing.
A polarizer can substitute for an ND filter to some extent (I think it takes 2 stops?), and combined with low iso can get you the desired results, too - below a shot done with 100asa film, polarizer and probably at f22 in the old film days, somewhere in Evolution Valley:
An aperture such as F16 or F22 will get you some blur in the water, but on a sunny day, that is barely enough to get the really foggy effect. An 8x ND filter will drop the light 8 f stops without changing the aperture, and without changing color/white balance. That allows you to work in brighter conditions, or use sharper apertures (diffraction causes most lenses to perform best near their brightest apertures - rarely will you see a lens as well a f11 or f16 as it does at F5.6), but don't put too much weight on the sharpness thing.
A polarizer can substitute for an ND filter to some extent (I think it takes 2 stops?), and combined with low iso can get you the desired results, too - below a shot done with 100asa film, polarizer and probably at f22 in the old film days, somewhere in Evolution Valley:
- Stevehymon
- Topix Acquainted
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2011 8:27 pm
- Experience: N/A
Re: Best Waterfall set up
I had same challenge figuring out how to shoot waterfalls with my Nikon D5000 DSLR. Finally got one right -- .2 shutter speed, f/22, +1/3 EV.
Escondido Falls, Santa Monica Mountains by JulieAndSteve, on Flickr
Escondido Falls, Santa Monica Mountains by JulieAndSteve, on Flickr
- pork50
- Topix Acquainted
- Posts: 92
- Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:01 pm
- Experience: N/A
Re: Best Waterfall set up
I have a kodak eazyshare Z981 point and shoot. The lens size is 26–676 mm, not sure exactly what size filter to get.rlown wrote:might just tell us which camera you have.
jogger by pork50, on Flickr
There is alot of expirementing you need to do to get the right picture, heres a picture i took at a marthon for some practice with shutter speeds.
EDIT: For this specific model, I need to purchase a lens adapter, and then a generic 72 mm lens will work
- maverick
- Forums Moderator
- Posts: 11995
- Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 5:54 pm
- Experience: Level 4 Explorer
Re: Best Waterfall set up
Hi Pork
Read this several part article, it will give you an in-depth understanding about taking
waterfall pictures. http://www.ronbigelow.com/articles/wate ... alls-1.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
He also has several other articles that may be of interest to you.
Read this several part article, it will give you an in-depth understanding about taking
waterfall pictures. http://www.ronbigelow.com/articles/wate ... alls-1.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
He also has several other articles that may be of interest to you.
Professional Sierra Landscape Photographer
I don't give out specific route information, my belief is that it takes away from the whole adventure spirit of a trip, if you need every inch planned out, you'll have to get that from someone else.
Have a safer backcountry experience by using the HST ReConn Form 2.0, named after Larry Conn, a HST member: http://reconn.org
I don't give out specific route information, my belief is that it takes away from the whole adventure spirit of a trip, if you need every inch planned out, you'll have to get that from someone else.
Have a safer backcountry experience by using the HST ReConn Form 2.0, named after Larry Conn, a HST member: http://reconn.org
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests