Wandering Daisy wrote:You use Kibbie Ridge as one of your key points. The environment of Kibbie Ridge may be different now than in the past, due to the Kibbie Ridge fire. I think the sensor is out in the open, however, I wonder if the general snowfall and melt there has been in any way altered. Any individual sensor is characteristic of a particular elevation and slope orientation and microclimate. I hesitate to make conclusions based on any single sensor. I would instead look at the % average melt graphs of the northern, middle and southern Sierra. Then look at sensors in the actual area you are planning your trip.
Agreed on all points, and that is actually what I am doing. I should have clarified that I was particularly interested in Kibbie since NW Yosemite is likely to be my first trip in about two weeks. And I certainly do appreciate your own trip report for the excellent "eyes on the ground" insight! (Or should I say "eyes on the snow"?!) Good point on the fire--it would of course not change how much it snowed, but it might impact the accuracy of the station in some way. The stations I've come across, though, are always in the open.
I am, however, tracking about a dozen stations in areas I am thinking of going later in the summer, and I am watching the regional CDEC summaries too. The regional plotlines all took a terrible turn for the worse (as far as us early season backpackers are concerned) over the last week. Anyone who has not looked at it in a week or so should:
http://cdec.water.ca.gov/cgi-progs/prod ... OT_SWC.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The unseasonably cool temperatures and added snow have pushed the lines much closer to the 1982-83 maximum year. In fact, in the North the snowpack is at 103% of what it is on average on the standard April 1 measuring date, and in the Central it is at 97%. The South is much better at 67%. In the North/Central, it is equivalent to us having an average year of snowfall and not a drop melting by the end of the first week of June!
Here are a few sensors I've been tracking for trips later in the summer I hope to do. Read 'em and weep. I have to hope for a hot spell and a roaring melt very soon.
Bishop Pass 11,200
2011 7 June 42" water content
2010 never reached as high as 42." Still higher than at any time last year.
2006 reached 42" on May 15, putting us 23 days behind
1998 reached 42" on June 5, putting us 2 days behind
1995 reached 42" on May 24, putting us 9 days behind
Dana Meadows 9,800
2011 7 June 27" water content
2010 reached 27" on June 3 putting us 4 days behind
2006 reached 27" on May 9 putting us 29 days behind
1998 reached 27" on June 5 putting us 2 days behind
1995 no data
Black Cap Basin 10,300
2011 7 June 40 " of water content
2010 reached 40" on May 5 putting us 25 days behind
2006 reached 40" on May 21 putting us 12 days behind
1998 reached 40" on June 21 putting us 14 days ahead
1995 no data
Slide Canyon 9,200
2011 7 June 50" of water content
2010 never reached as high as 50". Still higher than at any time last year.
2006 reached 50" on May 30 putting us 7 days behind
1998 reached 50" on June 13 putting us 6 days ahead
1995 reached 50" on July 3 putting us 26 days ahead
Naturally, some of this data may be corrupt, conditions around the stations may have changed, etc. But in general the pattern seems to put us between the 2006 model and the 1998 model, and increasingly close to 1998.