allow now Tulare Lake to remain

Grab your bear can or camp chair, kick your feet up and chew the fat about anything Sierra Nevada related that doesn't quite fit in any of the other forums. Within reason, (and the HST rules and guidelines) this is also an anything goes forum. Tell stories, discuss wilderness issues, music, or whatever else the High Sierra stirs up in your mind.
User avatar
Wandering Daisy
Topix Docent
Posts: 6960
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 8:19 pm
Experience: N/A
Location: Fair Oaks CA (Sacramento area)
Contact:

Re: allow now Tulare Lake to remain

Post by Wandering Daisy »

Groundwater recharge in the San Joaquin valley is what I worked on professionally. There are limits to the feasibility. The ground can absorb at limited rates, and a good share of farmland does not have great recharge rates. The big swings between drought and flood complicate picture too. There is the Corcoran Clay layer that limits most recharge to shallow groundwater. Just letting the flow sit in the center of the valley will not do a lot of good. Yes, you can perhaps make wetlands, but that would be primarily a wildlife benefit, which is not a bad idea in itself. But large area shallow water has huge evaporation losses that can result in saline water. Deep aquifer recharge mostly takes place up-valley closer to the Sierra. Each specific recharge area has its unique set of parameters; some work, others do not. There probably are better recharge sites east of Los Angeles in the desert. Problem is how to get the water there.

A big political and practical issue too. Water districts pay for construction and obviously store water for later use, which in recent years has included over-pumping and land subsidence, which destroys some of the aquifer's capability to hold water the next round. Economic feasibility is sketchy. It is very complicated and also comes with lots of unknowns. On a small scale there are some good recharge possibilities and current recharge projects have been built. But thinking restoring Tulare Lake will recharge the aquifer is not realistic.
User avatar
balzaccom
Topix Addict
Posts: 3053
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2008 9:22 pm
Experience: N/A

Re: allow now Tulare Lake to remain

Post by balzaccom »

Thank you, Daisy. You taught me more about this subject in your post than I've learned in many years reading newspaper articles!
Check our our website: http://www.backpackthesierra.com/
Or just read a good mystery novel set in the Sierra; https://www.amazon.com/Danger-Falling-R ... 0984884963
User avatar
mkbgdns
Topix Regular
Posts: 121
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 11:43 am
Experience: N/A

Re: allow now Tulare Lake to remain

Post by mkbgdns »

ditto. science over wishful thinking.
User avatar
texan
Topix Expert
Posts: 602
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 12:47 pm
Experience: N/A

Re: allow now Tulare Lake to remain

Post by texan »

balzaccom wrote: Tue Apr 04, 2023 9:08 am Thank you, Daisy. You taught me more about this subject in your post than I've learned in many years reading newspaper articles!
Thanks WD, your explanation about this subject is educational.

Texan
User avatar
frozenintime
Topix Regular
Posts: 310
Joined: Tue Aug 18, 2015 8:06 pm
Experience: N/A

Re: allow now Tulare Lake to remain

Post by frozenintime »

this is getting a bit far afield, but the recent discovery of so called "paleo valleys" is pretty exciting.

more here:
https://baynature.org/article/capturing ... waterways/
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests