Grab your bear can or camp chair, kick your feet up and chew the fat about anything Sierra Nevada related that doesn't quite fit in any of the other forums. Within reason, (and the HST rules and guidelines) this is also an anything goes forum. Tell stories, discuss wilderness issues, music, or whatever else the High Sierra stirs up in your mind.
Thanks, everyone, for the favorable responses to the story.
Actually, cgunderson, I can't recall if any fish jumped at the time of the tsunami. It was so long ago that, for example, drinking from Sierra streams and lakes without filtering the water was still expected. Besides, I was pretty distracted at that moment, watching the wave lap the shoreline across the lake.
Mountaineer, you may not have heard me laughing, but your post was one of the remarks that prompted sharing the story. So you can take some credit, gladly!
cgundersen wrote:Anyway, then I have a question for the "experts" out there (though I'm not sure quite what expertise is needed here). Long ago, I had the good fortune of walking along the shore of a small Sierra lake when a rockslide kicked up across the lake (initiated by some unseen "trundler"?). Aside from the obvious cacaphony and waterspouts accompanying the rocks that rolled into the lake, the other unexpected consequence was jumping fish: with each rock/boulder that hit the water, the surface exploded with dozens, if not hundreds of leaping trout. Being curious (but not malicious), I have, of course, tested whether this phenomenon can be artificially recreated. On the several occasions that I have rolled rocks into trout-infested waters, one can induce the same leaping behavior. So, the question for the experts is: is this a uniform behavior among trout (because I tend to go backpacking for the peace and tranquility, I have not done this experiment enough to know how reproducible it is, but I'd guess I'm 5 of 5 or thereabouts)? Does it serve a purpose (other than entertainment); after all, are jumping fish any less prone to get crushed by falling rocks? Or, is it just a startle response? Obviously, these musings are partly rhetorical, but I'm also curious whether the tsunami Bruce kicked up included leaping trout, though, perhaps it was just too extreme for the fish to respond?
cgundersen
I can't say I've ever tried or tested this because it's been my observation that a single rock thrown, intentionally or otherwise, tends to spook trout. Most trout I've seen cruising run for the deep when a rock hits the surface, unlike spawning largemouth bass that go take a look at the rock sinking to see if it's something to eat. It's possible that if the rock or rockfall is big enough that it may generate enough of a shock wave to provoke some sort of startle response--perhaps the single rock or so I've accidentally loosed on occasion wasn't big enough to do this. I do know that it possible for the shockwave to be too big. I've heard of folks who depth charged trout with boulders--this temporarily stuns the fish, I'm told, and thus stunned they float to the surface.
Hi GB,
I think that this is a situation where size matters......I've seen plenty of trout attracted to tiny pebbles that I've tossed into lakes. Bigger rocks definitely spook them. It's the much bigger varieties (rocks or small boulders that are within the limits of what I, with or without co-conspirators, can send rolling into a lake) that generate the leaping behavior I mentioned. The only times I've been provoked to do this in the last decade is when I've led neophytes into the Sierras and if they appear insufficiently seduced by the surroundings, I resort to more "pagan" distractions. It may not be a general treatment for ADHD, but it has worked...... sometimes, it's been hard to quell the fervor, once the spectacle is underway. What usually happens is that the array of easy-to-roll rocks is quickly depleted leaving only the hernia-inducers and that restores tranquility (and saves the poor fish).
CG