Cameras
- John Harper
- Topix Expert
- Posts: 486
- Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 11:54 am
- Experience: N/A
Re: Cameras
I just got a Coolpix A100, very light and compact. Hopefully it takes decent pictures, occasional fish photo, etc. It was only $90 with accessories so I guess I can't really go wrong. Composing a good scene (foreground, background, etc.) and keeping trees vertical are simple ways to help get a good picture in my experience.
John
John
- longri
- Topix Fanatic
- Posts: 1082
- Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2012 9:13 am
- Experience: N/A
Re: Cameras
I considered that camera when I bought a new P&S last year. For me it was just a hair too large for what I wanted (a camera that would disappear in my pocket). But it is clearly a superior camera and if that small size/weight consideration hadn't been a factor it's what I would have bought.oleander wrote:I have found my Canon Powershot S100 12.1 megapixel camera (7 ounces) to be the perfect upgrade over my former $100 camera.
- longri
- Topix Fanatic
- Posts: 1082
- Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2012 9:13 am
- Experience: N/A
Re: Cameras
It'll be fine in good lighting and disappoint you in poor lighting when your phone will probably outperform it.John Harper wrote:I just got a Coolpix A100, very light and compact. Hopefully it takes decent pictures, occasional fish photo, etc.
- Jimr
- Forums Moderator
- Posts: 2181
- Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 2:14 pm
- Experience: Level 4 Explorer
- Location: Torrance
Re: Cameras
Whatever P & S you eventually choose, as Mav said, your going to get much more out of your tool by learning about photography. Too many rely on the camera to take control of the shot rather than you. Understanding the basics of light, exposure, composition, dynamic range, white balance, etc. will help you to take control and get the most from whatever tool you decide to purchase.
If you don't know where you're going, then any path will get you there.
- rightstar76
- Topix Expert
- Posts: 776
- Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2006 3:22 pm
- Experience: N/A
Re: Cameras
Couldn't agree more.
Sierra Club Bulletin, Volume 26, Page 83, February 1941
Cedric Wright, "Mountain Photography,"The mountain photographer is interpreting the face of nature—that mysterious infinity; eternally a refuge, a reservoir, an amplifier of the spirit, a mother of dreams, a positive though elusive voice in whose depth lies its subtle power...Great art is usually created under some such saturation of awareness, where the work is permeated with an inner perception of beauty and an inner personal philosophy.
Sierra Club Bulletin, Volume 26, Page 83, February 1941
- SSSdave
- Topix Addict
- Posts: 3583
- Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 11:18 pm
- Experience: N/A
- Location: Silicon Valley
- Contact:
Re: Cameras
Suggest visiting dpreview forums though first visit this page to become grounded.
https://www.dpreview.com/buying-guides
Buying a more sophisticated camera will not help those that have not made an effort to learn photography basics that in this era also means knowing basics of post processing programs and pc computers. Learning camera basics is not difficult technically so anyone can rather easily learn if they simply take time to do so. One cannot "buy" oneself into photograhic quality. Many have bought expensive cameras, not made an effort to educate themselves, and become stuck with like Homer Simpson legions in simplistic Auto or Scene modes, thus ending up no better than someone with a dumbed down $99 P&S.
https://www.dpreview.com/buying-guides
Buying a more sophisticated camera will not help those that have not made an effort to learn photography basics that in this era also means knowing basics of post processing programs and pc computers. Learning camera basics is not difficult technically so anyone can rather easily learn if they simply take time to do so. One cannot "buy" oneself into photograhic quality. Many have bought expensive cameras, not made an effort to educate themselves, and become stuck with like Homer Simpson legions in simplistic Auto or Scene modes, thus ending up no better than someone with a dumbed down $99 P&S.
- fishmonger
- Topix Fanatic
- Posts: 1250
- Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 10:27 am
- Experience: Level 4 Explorer
- Location: Madison, WI
- Contact:
Re: Cameras
As much as I agree with the view that automatic modes are not extracting the maximum performance of a camera, I would say that a $3000 DSLR will take far better images in auto mode than an $99 P&S - it's just a function of the better sensor, glass and hopefully better metering system.
Is it worth the price if that is all you're going to do with that camera? Absolutely not. I think at the $500 price point, the point-and-shoot full auto performance hits a plateau of diminishing returns. Back in the film SLR days, a better camera body bought you absolutely nothing as long as film and lens were the same.
In fact, talking about auto modes, I recall having my first experience with such "progress" back in 1987 I went from a Nikkormat EL to a Nikon F3HP: I lost the EL's very reliable 60% centerweight metering in favor of a more strongly 80/20 centereighted metering in the F3. At that point I switched over to manual exposure, because the expensive camera wasn't getting it right a lot of the time. And wouldn't you know it - on a normal sunny day in the mountains, 100 asa film any variant of the 500/f8 rule usually worked just fine, e.g 1/250s f/11.0 on a sunny afternoon will likely give you a better exposure than the camera will meter, especially if there's a large patch of snow near center frame
Is it worth the price if that is all you're going to do with that camera? Absolutely not. I think at the $500 price point, the point-and-shoot full auto performance hits a plateau of diminishing returns. Back in the film SLR days, a better camera body bought you absolutely nothing as long as film and lens were the same.
In fact, talking about auto modes, I recall having my first experience with such "progress" back in 1987 I went from a Nikkormat EL to a Nikon F3HP: I lost the EL's very reliable 60% centerweight metering in favor of a more strongly 80/20 centereighted metering in the F3. At that point I switched over to manual exposure, because the expensive camera wasn't getting it right a lot of the time. And wouldn't you know it - on a normal sunny day in the mountains, 100 asa film any variant of the 500/f8 rule usually worked just fine, e.g 1/250s f/11.0 on a sunny afternoon will likely give you a better exposure than the camera will meter, especially if there's a large patch of snow near center frame
- michaelzim
- Topix Regular
- Posts: 398
- Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 7:09 am
- Experience: Level 3 Backpacker
- Location: Ukiah - CA
Re: Cameras
I have exactly the same questions - what did you end up with and how has it worked out?
Thanks much!
Thanks much!
- phoenix2000
- Topix Acquainted
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 8:15 am
- Experience: N/A
Re: Cameras
tlsharb,
Not all of my pictures turn out perfect either. Have you ever tried editing your photos with an editor like Adobe Photoshop Express to adjust the exposure, contrast, highlights, shadows, etc.
Adobe Photoshop Express is free and you can download it from the Apple Store or Windows Store (https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/p/adobe ... verviewtab)
Not all of my pictures turn out perfect either. Have you ever tried editing your photos with an editor like Adobe Photoshop Express to adjust the exposure, contrast, highlights, shadows, etc.
Adobe Photoshop Express is free and you can download it from the Apple Store or Windows Store (https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/p/adobe ... verviewtab)
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests