Sierra forests & wildlife to feel impact of climate change | High Sierra Topix  

Sierra forests & wildlife to feel impact of climate change

Grab your bear can or camp chair, kick your feet up and chew the fat about anything Sierra Nevada related that doesn't quite fit in any of the other forums. Within reason, (and the HST rules and guidelines) this is also an anything goes forum. Tell stories, discuss wilderness issues, music, or whatever else the High Sierra stirs up in your mind.
User avatar

Sierra forests & wildlife to feel impact of climate change

Postby ERIC » Sat Jun 21, 2008 8:18 am

Sierra forests and wildlife will feel impact of climate change

Greyson Howard / Sierra Sun
Monday, June 16, 2008

The Sierra Nevada has been characterized as the “canary in the coal mine,” or early alarm for deleterious effects of rising temperatures resulting from climate change, according to the U.S. Forest Service.

But all parts of the Sierra won’t be treated equally. Despite Truckee-Tahoe’s more northern latitude, the area likely will be hit harder than the taller mountains to the south.

“The area around Tahoe and Donner Summit, for example, would be more affected than Kings Canyon,” said Josh Viers, an assistant research ecologist at the University of California, Davis.

And so Tahoe National Forest has been picked as an open-air laboratory for climate change — a focal point in a global issue — with researchers from academic bodies, conservation groups and the Forest Service gleaning whatever they can learn from the surrounding woods.

“When I started, I was a naysayer, ready to poke holes in global warming,” said Carol Kennedy, the watershed project manager for the Tahoe National Forest. “I don’t poke holes anymore.”

Retreating trees
Perhaps easiest to predict and already in progress in some cases is the steady retreat of vegetation away from rising low-elevation temperatures and toward ever-shrinking snow melt, Viers said.

However, not all species and ecosystems will move at the same rate, he said.
“What has been documented at higher elevation is the leading edge is moving up much slower than the trailing edge, and species are feeling the squeeze,” Viers said. “In practice, the ponderosa pine is pretty hard hit.”

Kennedy said ponderosa pines already have moved up to 500 meters upslope.
The different speed at which trees climb also could mean different mixes of species in future Sierra forests, she said.

Subalpine regions — places where snow traditionally sticks for too long to for anything bigger then brush and grasses to survive — already are seeing conifer growth, said Scott Conway, vegetation management officer for the Tahoe National Forest’s Truckee Ranger District.

“Places where 20 or 30 years ago trees couldn’t become established are now seeing baby fir trees,” Conway said.

Chad Hanson, director of the John Muir Project who also is doing post-doctoral research at UC Davis, agreed that subalpine species in the region are a concern.

“They may not be affected as early as species lower down, but subalpine species can’t go much higher,” Hanson said.

But his No. 1 concern is the sugar pine, Hanson said.

“What I’m really worried about are some of the conifer species associated with the mid-to upper elevations. As the climate warms, they may recede up the slope as the lower elevation becomes inhospitable, and wildlife species will have to go up with them,” Hanson said.

Another study tracking forest elevation gain is a collaboration between the Forest Service, the Nature Conservancy, UC Berkeley, Stanford University and others, said Patrick Gonzalez, climate change scientist with the Nature Conservancy.

Their work along the North Fork of the Yuba River focuses on three forest systems at different elevations, he said.

“In the Downieville, the climate is warming at seven times the global rate,” Gonzalez said. “We’re seeing signs of many of the species shifting upward.”

But trees may not move simply upslope and to the north seeking cooler climes, said Mark Nechadom, the climate science policy director for the Forest Service.

Cheryl Yeh, presidential management fellow with the Forest Service, said while some tree species climb higher, others could drop into cooler valleys with their own microclimates.

Animals on the move
The complexity of change in the forest may mean trouble for the animals that depend on them, Nechadom said, where some species may be able to move with the change but others may go extinct.

“One species we are paying close attention to is the pika,” Nechadom said. “It’s a very high-elevation species related to the rabbit, whose habitat is drying and warming up.”

The Forest Service’s Kennedy said generalist species, such as deer, likely will come through climate change, whereas specialist species may not.

“Some predictions show 15 to 35 percent of the species in our ecosystem effectively extinct in the next 100 years,” Kennedy said.

Other species dependent on streams or other watery environments don’t always have the ability to relocate, Nechadom said.

The water problem
While rising temperatures directly will affect many species, indirect effects through changing water availability may be even more drastic.

“Between 7,000 and 9,000 feet, the rain/snow mix line will be most severely affected,” said Viers of UC Davis. This means the timing and flow of streams and river could change, possibly three to seven weeks earlier, he said.

“Everything from what’s in the streams — frogs breeding to vegetation along the side of the streams — a whole series of effects, will come from just the timing,” Viers said.
The breeding cycles of both the mountain red- and yellow-legged frogs of the Sierra may no longer match with stream flows, he said.

Trout require cold water, no more than 20 to 21 degrees Celsius, meaning many streams could become too warm, Viers said. Flowering plants may bloom with high flows before pollinators such as bees and mosquitoes emerge.

Aspen trees, already diminishing in the West, are at risk because of drying stream habitat, Nechadom said.

And moisture could be dropping on the order of 40 percent to 60 percent by the year 2100, Kennedy said.

That kind of change doesn’t just affect the most water-dependent species, but almost all species across the board, scientists said.

Fires, pests, disease
Climate change also could make forests even more susceptible to problems currently plaguing the Sierra.

Federal forester Conway said warmer temperatures — potentially an increase of 3 to 4 degrees Celsius in the winter, 4 to 7 degrees Celsius in the summer in the next 100 years — will put significant strain on forests already struggling to survive fires, bark beetle infestations and other issues.

“One thing models are showing is we are likely to see more drought and therefore more fire,” Nechadom said. “We’ll see more fire both in quantity and intensity.”

One or two extra months of summer means that Sierra species not only will go through a dormant period in the winter, but in the summer as well, leaving them open for bark beetle infestations, said Kennedy of the Tahoe National Forest.

And with 80 percent to 90 percent of trees in the Truckee-Tahoe area forests susceptible to bark beetles, that could mean massive change, Conway said.

“That isn’t just out in the forest, but in peoples’ yards,” Conway said.
New members, please consider giving us an intro!
Follow us on Twitter @HighSierraTopix. Use hashtags #SIERRAPHILE #GotSierra? #GotMountains?
Follow us on Facebook:

User avatar
Your Humble Host & Forums Administrator
Your Humble Host & Forums Administrator
Posts: 2898
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 9:13 am
Location: between the 916 and 661
Experience: Level 4 Explorer

Return to The Campfire

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests