Congrats Buck for piece in OP
-
Sierra Maclure
- Topix Regular
- Posts: 137
- Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 8:25 am
- Experience: N/A
- Location: Bay Area
- Contact:
Congrats Buck for piece in OP
Let me be the first to congratulate Buck Forester on his great piece and picture in the latest edition of Outdoor Photographer. Way to go!!!
In the Spirit of the Wilderness, SM
http://pages.sbcglobal.net/sierramaclure/
http://sierramaclure.smugmug.com/
http://pages.sbcglobal.net/sierramaclure/
http://sierramaclure.smugmug.com/
-
copeg
- Founding Member & Forums Administrator
- Posts: 2125
- Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 9:25 pm
- Experience: Level 4 Explorer
- Location: Menlo Park, CA
- Contact:
-
Shawn
- Topix Fanatic
- Posts: 1072
- Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2005 9:56 pm
- Experience: Level 4 Explorer
-
Snow Nymph
- Founding Member
- Posts: 2041
- Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 6:43 pm
- Experience: Level 4 Explorer
- Location: Mammoth Lakes, CA
- Contact:
Re: Congrats Buck for piece in OP
Congratulations! 
Expose yourself to your deepest fear; after that, fear has no power, and the fear of freedom shrinks and vanishes. You are free . . . . Jim Morrison
http://snownymph.smugmug.com/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://snownymph.smugmug.com/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
markskor
- Founding Member - RIP
- Posts: 2442
- Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 5:41 pm
- Experience: Level 4 Explorer
- Location: Crowley Lake and Tuolumne Meadows
Re: Congrats Buck for piece in OP
Most deserved...you got the magic eye
Mountainman who swims with trout
-
Hikin Mike
- Founding Member
- Posts: 552
- Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 5:56 pm
- Experience: N/A
- Location: Atwater, CA
- Contact:
-
Windwalker
- Founding Member
- Posts: 306
- Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 5:49 pm
- Experience: N/A
- Location: Porterville, CA
- Contact:
Re: Congrats Buck for piece in OP
Mr Forester it is an honor and a pleasure to know you.
Congrats on the article and awesome photo!!!
Congrats on the article and awesome photo!!!
-
maverick
- Forums Moderator
- Posts: 12087
- Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 5:54 pm
- Experience: Level 4 Explorer
Re: Congrats Buck for piece in OP
Congratulations Buck!!
-
hikerduane
- Founding Member
- Posts: 1270
- Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 9:58 am
- Experience: Level 4 Explorer
- Location: Meadow Valley, CA
-
Buck Forester
- Founding Member
- Posts: 452
- Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 1:38 pm
- Experience: N/A
- Location: Lincoln, CA (Sacramento area)
- Contact:
Re: Congrats Buck for piece in OP
Hey, thanks! I just saw this (been away too long!).
One sorta funny thing in this article is that I wrote I used a B+W circular polarizer (brand name), but whoever edited the article at OP put it as "black and white circular polarizer", ha ha! Not sure what that is.
It's sorta like the editors at National Geographic Adventure magazine when they wrote in my text for my Mono Lake paddling image that I was surrounded by 15,000' peaks! It went to print that way and I asked them about it and they said the highest peak is 14,490+, which is close enough to 15,000', so they just rounded up. Well, the peaks around Mono Lake are more in the 12,000' range, but even so, that's like saying Base Camp at Mt. Everest is surrounded by 30,000' peaks. I'm not sure 'rounding up' is a good idea when it exceeds the highest peak in the entire region (or the world). But hey, I was still thankful and they corrected it in the online version.
I'm gonna start requesting to review the final edit version before publication, ha!
One sorta funny thing in this article is that I wrote I used a B+W circular polarizer (brand name), but whoever edited the article at OP put it as "black and white circular polarizer", ha ha! Not sure what that is.
It's sorta like the editors at National Geographic Adventure magazine when they wrote in my text for my Mono Lake paddling image that I was surrounded by 15,000' peaks! It went to print that way and I asked them about it and they said the highest peak is 14,490+, which is close enough to 15,000', so they just rounded up. Well, the peaks around Mono Lake are more in the 12,000' range, but even so, that's like saying Base Camp at Mt. Everest is surrounded by 30,000' peaks. I'm not sure 'rounding up' is a good idea when it exceeds the highest peak in the entire region (or the world). But hey, I was still thankful and they corrected it in the online version.
I'm gonna start requesting to review the final edit version before publication, ha!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests