The local paper in Calistoga published an article I wrote about overtourism and its impacts. It's a long read, but that's because it's complex topic.
Their website doesn't have the story up yet, so here's a link to my version:
https://www.paulwagnerwine.com/post/ove ... -face-napa
Too many people!
- balzaccom
- Topix Addict
- Posts: 3110
- Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2008 9:22 pm
- Experience: N/A
Too many people!
Check our our website: http://www.backpackthesierra.com/
Or just read a good mystery novel set in the Sierra; https://www.amazon.com/Danger-Falling-R ... 0984884963
Or just read a good mystery novel set in the Sierra; https://www.amazon.com/Danger-Falling-R ... 0984884963
- Schleppy
- Topix Acquainted
- Posts: 80
- Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2023 11:04 am
- Experience: Level 4 Explorer
- Location: East Bay, CA, hey, hey!)
Re: Too many people!
Cool! Great exploration of the issue. Thank you.
As you reiterate several times, it's happening all over the place. I suspect Napa will continue to head the way ski towns have gone, which is to say a lot of empty houses owned by rich people as second/vacation homes or kept as vacation rentals. Bedroom communities for workers commuting in from afar. It plays out the same everywhere.
You touch on affordable housing construction to house low income workers. That's fine (if it's allowed to happen), but also has a weird underclass tinge to it. Locally working residents live congested into dense housing complexes. Second homes and investment properties sit vacant or with tourists occupying them. This is actually something about the Spanish unrest that is little talked about. Empty villas sit above congested apartment complexes that keep rising in cost. It angers people.
Everyone seems happy about the value of their homes skyrocketing, but no one likes what it produces. Can't have cake and eat it too. To some extent, becoming wealthy means coming to terms with serfdom.
As you reiterate several times, it's happening all over the place. I suspect Napa will continue to head the way ski towns have gone, which is to say a lot of empty houses owned by rich people as second/vacation homes or kept as vacation rentals. Bedroom communities for workers commuting in from afar. It plays out the same everywhere.
You touch on affordable housing construction to house low income workers. That's fine (if it's allowed to happen), but also has a weird underclass tinge to it. Locally working residents live congested into dense housing complexes. Second homes and investment properties sit vacant or with tourists occupying them. This is actually something about the Spanish unrest that is little talked about. Empty villas sit above congested apartment complexes that keep rising in cost. It angers people.
Everyone seems happy about the value of their homes skyrocketing, but no one likes what it produces. Can't have cake and eat it too. To some extent, becoming wealthy means coming to terms with serfdom.
- John Harper
- Topix Expert
- Posts: 493
- Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 11:54 am
- Experience: N/A
Re: Too many people!
Just wait until private equity scoops up all the property in Pacific Palisades from long time property owners who cannot afford to rebuild, pay taxes on newly rebuilt property, or get insurance.
John
John
- TahoeJeff
- Topix Fanatic
- Posts: 1239
- Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 11:03 am
- Experience: Level 3 Backpacker
- Location: South Lake Tahoe, NV
Re: Too many people!
What does the fire and private equity have to do with Paul's article????
Higher taxes never reduce the deficit. Governments spend whatever they take in and then whatever they can get away with.
Milton Friedman
Milton Friedman
- John Harper
- Topix Expert
- Posts: 493
- Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 11:54 am
- Experience: N/A
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests