Why wait? Some of us are already there.oldranger wrote: Wait until you are 70!
I'm still trying to figure out what I want to be when I get really old.
Why wait? Some of us are already there.oldranger wrote: Wait until you are 70!
Could you elaborate, please?bobby49 wrote:There are ways around that problem that some of us discovered decades ago. It's partially a training issue.longri wrote:For many people a 2cm thick foam pad isn't comfortable. The OP writes, "thin pads mean sore hips and pretty crappy sleep"
I can hammock camp just about anywhere in the Sierra, when backpacking. Even in the high country. I can't necessarily in redwood forests, where they are banned. I generally don't in car campgrounds as there are no guarantees of trees. But my significant alien can't get in the hammock with me as that would exceed the load limits of the suspension. So we have a Tarptent for those occasions. And going to the Lost Coast, I'm taking a tent with sand anchors.John Harper wrote:If there aren't any trees close enough together, it's definitely not very practical. I spoke with a guy from the east who had brought a hammock with him. He said the trees are much closer together, and the ground much wetter back east where they are more popular (and practical). He couldn't find two trees close to each other that were within 200 yards of the rest of his group.AlmostThere wrote:
Just got back from another trail crew weekend. I usually carry the hammock. When you're sawing stuff and digging and flinging branches around all day (red fir branches can weigh 50-80 lbs all by themselves) there's absolutely nothing like a hammock, in which you can stretch and bend in ways that a pad won't let you, and that underquilt moves right along with you keeping you warm...
I'm taking the inflatable when I'm going where hammocking is less practical (not impossible, just not practical) but it's not quite the same.
John
Define "thin."longri wrote:Could you elaborate, please?bobby49 wrote:There are ways around that problem that some of us discovered decades ago. It's partially a training issue.longri wrote:For many people a 2cm thick foam pad isn't comfortable. The OP writes, "thin pads mean sore hips and pretty crappy sleep"
If it's possible to be comfortable on a thin ensolite pad I'd really like to know how to do it.
30 feet? Wow. Quite an engineer as well. Hope your hiking companions don't "clothesline" themselves in the dark.AlmostThere wrote:I can suspend my hammock between trees that are 12 - 30 feet apart
bobby49 wrote:There are ways around that problem that some of us discovered decades ago. It's partially a training issue.
So by "training" you mean acclimating your body to harder surfaces. I used to practice that as well, sleeping on a backpacking pad at home. With hindsight I'm not convinced it was really doing all that much. A soft bed hurts my back as well and the floor is preferable to that. So I got a really firm bed.bobby49 wrote:I practice at home. I get a sore back from sleeping in a soft bed, so I sleep on the floor. After a while, that feels perfectly normal. Then when I go on a backpacking trip, the Gossamer Gear foam pad feels pretty good. I don't camp on solid rock, and I don't camp on solid earth. Where I camp is someplace where somebody has probably camped before, so there is often a depression or sand. Then I can augment the foam pad with clothing underneath it.
Being an east coaster, I've found this to be exceptionally true. There is nowhere I've backpacked in the east where a hammock not only was practical, but most certainly preferable. I've had the same Clark's jungle hammock for 15+ years and it is certainly one of the most outstanding pieces of gear I have ever owned. The advent of the EMU straps for hanging it up made it even better. I'm doing a little 2 nighter this coming weekend up near the Appalachian Trail and I will certainly be leaving the tent home. Just had the hammock out in Mojave Preserve last month and had this beautiful setup:John Harper wrote: Just got back from another trail crew weekend. I usually carry the hammock. When you're sawing stuff and digging and flinging branches around all day (red fir branches can weigh 50-80 lbs all by themselves) there's absolutely nothing like a hammock, in which you can stretch and bend in ways that a pad won't let you, and that underquilt moves right along with you keeping you warm...
I'm taking the inflatable when I'm going where hammocking is less practical (not impossible, just not practical) but it's not quite the same. If there aren't any trees close enough together, it's definitely not very practical. I spoke with a guy from the east who had brought a hammock with him. He said the trees are much closer together, and the ground much wetter back east where they are more popular (and practical). He couldn't find two trees close to each other that were within 200 yards of the rest of his group.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 3 guests