Andrew Irvine finally found on Everest
Posted: Fri Nov 22, 2024 11:57 am
I hope this is suitable for our Campfire, though I can only connect it to the Sierra at an oblique angle-- I am thinking of the ongoing (I hope) search for the remains of Mathew Greene in the Minarets.
So, I just today had this story pop up on the web, as I trolled through Youtube looking for travel or sports highlights. Did most of you already know that Andrew Irvine, the partner of George Mallory on their last gasp effort to summit Everest in 1924, has been found? This was news to me, though the remains of Irvine were located in September of this year. This, coupled with the finding in 1999 of his partner, the famous Mallory, has once again reopened the discussion of who first summited the highest mountain in the world. The body-- just a boot, and a sock with Irvine's name embroidered on it, with a foot inside-- was found much lower down the face of the mountain from that of Mallory, and the pocket Kodak camera was not among the remains-- not yet anyway. That camera is a much sought after item, as it just might contain footage documenting their time on the summit.
The salient points of the Mallory-Irvine summit story are the fact that when Mallory's entire body was found, his snow goggles were inside his shirt pocket, indicating that they were likely descending the mountain in relative darkness (after a long climb to the summit?); secondly, it was noted that the photographs of Mallory's wife were not found in his things, and he had said that he intended to put them on the summit. And then, going back in time, recall that the photographer Odell (or was is the climber Norton?), had stated that the climbers were last seen nearing the Second Step, and going strong.
Okay then, in my effort to tie this back to the Sierra, there is first the analogous situation with Matthew Greene-- that is, the mention in this article of how the families of lost climbers are very gratified for the discovery of their loved ones. Secondly, we have the mountainous monuments to these lost climbers in the southern Sierra peaks: "Mallory" and "Irvine." Here is a link to the Nat. Geo. article:
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/adve ... nd-everest
So, I just today had this story pop up on the web, as I trolled through Youtube looking for travel or sports highlights. Did most of you already know that Andrew Irvine, the partner of George Mallory on their last gasp effort to summit Everest in 1924, has been found? This was news to me, though the remains of Irvine were located in September of this year. This, coupled with the finding in 1999 of his partner, the famous Mallory, has once again reopened the discussion of who first summited the highest mountain in the world. The body-- just a boot, and a sock with Irvine's name embroidered on it, with a foot inside-- was found much lower down the face of the mountain from that of Mallory, and the pocket Kodak camera was not among the remains-- not yet anyway. That camera is a much sought after item, as it just might contain footage documenting their time on the summit.
The salient points of the Mallory-Irvine summit story are the fact that when Mallory's entire body was found, his snow goggles were inside his shirt pocket, indicating that they were likely descending the mountain in relative darkness (after a long climb to the summit?); secondly, it was noted that the photographs of Mallory's wife were not found in his things, and he had said that he intended to put them on the summit. And then, going back in time, recall that the photographer Odell (or was is the climber Norton?), had stated that the climbers were last seen nearing the Second Step, and going strong.
Okay then, in my effort to tie this back to the Sierra, there is first the analogous situation with Matthew Greene-- that is, the mention in this article of how the families of lost climbers are very gratified for the discovery of their loved ones. Secondly, we have the mountainous monuments to these lost climbers in the southern Sierra peaks: "Mallory" and "Irvine." Here is a link to the Nat. Geo. article:
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/adve ... nd-everest