Politics, Backpacking, Sierra
- rlown
- Topix Docent
- Posts: 8224
- Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 5:00 pm
- Experience: Level 4 Explorer
- Location: Wilton, CA
Re: Politics, Backpacking, Sierra
maybe off topic but I'd really like to see 168 completed. No worse then what they did in Glacier.
- oldranger
- Topix Addict
- Posts: 2871
- Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 9:18 pm
- Experience: N/A
- Location: Bend, Oregon
Re: Politics, Backpacking, Sierra
Russ,
Not only no but F--- NO!
Mike
Not only no but F--- NO!
Mike
Mike
Who can't do everything he used to and what he can do takes a hell of a lot longer!
Who can't do everything he used to and what he can do takes a hell of a lot longer!
- rlown
- Topix Docent
- Posts: 8224
- Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 5:00 pm
- Experience: Level 4 Explorer
- Location: Wilton, CA
Re: Politics, Backpacking, Sierra
think of the economic benefits. to the area.
capitalism is a cancer or it doesn't work!
That would employ like 5 geologists and major road crews which seems to be the favor right now in CA.
capitalism is a cancer or it doesn't work!
That would employ like 5 geologists and major road crews which seems to be the favor right now in CA.
- ERIC
- Your Humble Host & Forums Administrator
- Posts: 3254
- Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 9:13 am
- Experience: Level 4 Explorer
- Location: between the 916 and 661
Re: Politics, Backpacking, Sierra
+1oldranger wrote:Russ,
Not only no but F--- NO!
Mike
Original plan to complete 168 included reservoirs flooding out Blayney and Evolution Valleys, just to name two areas worth protecting, IMO.
And what I find ironic about Mike's earlier point (if this is true), it's my understanding that Reagan was the Gov. to stop 168 expansion in it's tracks before it could even reach Kaiser Pass. That's what I've read, anyway. I'm too young to remember.

New members, please consider giving us an intro!
Follow us on Twitter @HighSierraTopix. Use hashtags #SIERRAPHILE #GotSierra? #GotMountains?
Follow us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/HighSierraTopix
Follow us on Twitter @HighSierraTopix. Use hashtags #SIERRAPHILE #GotSierra? #GotMountains?
Follow us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/HighSierraTopix
- rlown
- Topix Docent
- Posts: 8224
- Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 5:00 pm
- Experience: Level 4 Explorer
- Location: Wilton, CA
Re: Politics, Backpacking, Sierra
if i could find the original plan, that would be helpful. Google search seems to just show what it is today.
I still see nothing wrong with completing that road, sans the reservoirs. no different than 120 or others in the NPS system. And it'll be closed most of the year anyway. A wtf doesn't answer why.
Eric, glad you added to your comment cuz i was going right there. One needs more info to make the actual determination.
Russ
I still see nothing wrong with completing that road, sans the reservoirs. no different than 120 or others in the NPS system. And it'll be closed most of the year anyway. A wtf doesn't answer why.
Eric, glad you added to your comment cuz i was going right there. One needs more info to make the actual determination.
Russ
- ERIC
- Your Humble Host & Forums Administrator
- Posts: 3254
- Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 9:13 am
- Experience: Level 4 Explorer
- Location: between the 916 and 661
Re: Politics, Backpacking, Sierra
Even without reservoirs, I prefer to hike to those two beautiful locations. Not drive to them. Among other popular backcountry routes, methinks it sure would make the North Lake - South Lake loop a 'different' experience. No thanks.
New members, please consider giving us an intro!
Follow us on Twitter @HighSierraTopix. Use hashtags #SIERRAPHILE #GotSierra? #GotMountains?
Follow us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/HighSierraTopix
Follow us on Twitter @HighSierraTopix. Use hashtags #SIERRAPHILE #GotSierra? #GotMountains?
Follow us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/HighSierraTopix
- gdurkee
- Founding Member
- Posts: 786
- Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 8:20 pm
- Experience: N/A
Re: Politics, Backpacking, Sierra
Eeeeek. Completing 168 would have been -- and would still be -- an absolute disaster for the wilderness character of that entire region. Reagan did stop it -- not because he cared about the wilderness (though some say he actually did) but because it would have cost too much and for very little return.
Look at the areas that do have trans Sierra highways and there's not a huge amount of economic development as a result, once you get above about 4,000 feet and especially on the east side. Look at current development above Twain Harte (108) or Arnold (4). Shaver has a pretty good road to it, but try finding a place to eat after October 1. Lee Vining's stayed about the same size since forever. Minden etc. don't benefit a whole lot from even an all year highway. From Mono Lake south, there's no water to support development, so effects are limited right there.
A side note: You can still see the large blazes SCE chopped onto trees (in the 30s??) at Evolution Meadow and Colby to show the rough placement of dams.
g.
Look at the areas that do have trans Sierra highways and there's not a huge amount of economic development as a result, once you get above about 4,000 feet and especially on the east side. Look at current development above Twain Harte (108) or Arnold (4). Shaver has a pretty good road to it, but try finding a place to eat after October 1. Lee Vining's stayed about the same size since forever. Minden etc. don't benefit a whole lot from even an all year highway. From Mono Lake south, there's no water to support development, so effects are limited right there.
A side note: You can still see the large blazes SCE chopped onto trees (in the 30s??) at Evolution Meadow and Colby to show the rough placement of dams.
g.
- rlown
- Topix Docent
- Posts: 8224
- Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 5:00 pm
- Experience: Level 4 Explorer
- Location: Wilton, CA
Re: Politics, Backpacking, Sierra
yeah.. never said it would be an all year highway. it'd have the same character as 120, which obviously must have some economic benefit given the push to open it every year.
- gdurkee
- Founding Member
- Posts: 786
- Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 8:20 pm
- Experience: N/A
Re: Politics, Backpacking, Sierra
Ha! The legendary Gene Rose weighs in with a quick reply to me:
I was there...more or less. Yes, SCE wanted dams in Evolution and over on their West side with Granite Creek and other spots above Clover Meadow.
In the post WWII road-building craze several Sierra road projects were advanced. There was a big fight in Kings Canyon because the Sierra Club saw an extension of 180 to Cedar Grove and Zumwalt Meadow as a staged trans-Sierra route to Alpendale, west of Bishop. If you go west out of Bishop, the highway is even designated as 168.
There was also talk of a Theodore Solomon route that would run in the front country of the west slope of the Sierra.
The North Fork to Mammoth, via Minaret Summit or Mammoth Pass, was the contentious one. It was even staked around 1959, but Ike Livermore, Governor Reagan's resource secretary and Whitney packer, recommended against it...and Reagan took his advice. Reagan later claimed it was his proudest moment as governor. Yes, cost was a concern but the political will was big issue. As I recall even the folks around Mammoth were opposed to it because they didn't have the infrastructure to support the anticipated visitation.
At one time, the folks at Mammoth, Bob Schott, asked me to do a book on it, but realizing the limited market I could not find a publisher. My files on this project are in Special Collections at the CSUF Madden Library.
- tomba
- Topix Expert
- Posts: 503
- Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2011 12:50 pm
- Experience: Level 4 Explorer
- Location: Bay Area
Re: Politics, Backpacking, Sierra
Here is an old map showing apparently hand-drawn reservoirs in Blaney Meadows, Lake Florence, and Vermilion Valley.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 7 guests