Page 3 of 3
Re: Why carry a firearm in wilderness if it can't be discharged?
Posted: Thu Aug 05, 2021 9:02 am
by Jimr
My guess would be for those who are carrying in their pack, they are not worried about what may happen on-trail. Their concern is what may happen in-camp. I've heard a couple of stories, but I'm not at liberty to share them.
Re: Why carry a firearm in wilderness if it can't be discharged?
Posted: Thu Aug 05, 2021 9:21 am
by rlown
I rarely carry anymore unless hunting. That mode becomes obvious as an 8" scoped Redhawk revolver and a 7mm rifle is outside the pack.
Archery just opened up. Almost time to put on the orange again. My focus is currently on Stampede res, Plaskett meadow near 162 and Trinity. Once I can hike again.
Re: Why carry a firearm in wilderness if it can't be discharged?
Posted: Fri Aug 06, 2021 12:04 pm
by DaveF
One answer to the question might be that not all trips in the SEKI wilderness start or end in SEKI. Pass-through hikers who carry can do so legally, even if they can't discharge while in the park. Non-gun owner here, so doesn't appeal to me, but it's clear from other responses here that some do choose to carry while hiking. That might include some pass-through hikers.