Why carry a firearm in wilderness if it can't be discharged?
- Jimr
- Forums Moderator
- Posts: 2182
- Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 2:14 pm
- Experience: Level 4 Explorer
- Location: Torrance
Re: Why carry a firearm in wilderness if it can't be discharged?
My guess would be for those who are carrying in their pack, they are not worried about what may happen on-trail. Their concern is what may happen in-camp. I've heard a couple of stories, but I'm not at liberty to share them.
If you don't know where you're going, then any path will get you there.
- rlown
- Topix Docent
- Posts: 8224
- Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 5:00 pm
- Experience: Level 4 Explorer
- Location: Wilton, CA
Re: Why carry a firearm in wilderness if it can't be discharged?
I rarely carry anymore unless hunting. That mode becomes obvious as an 8" scoped Redhawk revolver and a 7mm rifle is outside the pack.
Archery just opened up. Almost time to put on the orange again. My focus is currently on Stampede res, Plaskett meadow near 162 and Trinity. Once I can hike again.
Archery just opened up. Almost time to put on the orange again. My focus is currently on Stampede res, Plaskett meadow near 162 and Trinity. Once I can hike again.
- DaveF
- Topix Novice
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2021 11:08 am
- Experience: Level 2 Backpacker
Re: Why carry a firearm in wilderness if it can't be discharged?
One answer to the question might be that not all trips in the SEKI wilderness start or end in SEKI. Pass-through hikers who carry can do so legally, even if they can't discharge while in the park. Non-gun owner here, so doesn't appeal to me, but it's clear from other responses here that some do choose to carry while hiking. That might include some pass-through hikers.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests