Re: Friendly Reminder...USE YOUR SUNSCREEN!!!
Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2011 2:57 pm
Thanks all for responding to my post...hopefully it stimulated some thoughts for everyone
Sierra Nevada related information; backpacking, camping, hiking, snowboarding, skiing, fishing, photography, and more!
https://www.highsierratopix.com/community/
https://www.highsierratopix.com/community/viewtopic.php?t=6083
"Abstract
Sunscreen products are rated upon their ability to inhibit visible redness of the skin 24 h after measured doses of ultraviolet (UV) exposure (Sun Protection Factor, SPF). Although sunscreens prevent UV-induced redness, their ability to protect against melanoma or the development of moles is less clear. UV-induced redness occurs in part by the action of nitric oxide (NO), synthesized in the skin. NO is also an important immunoregulatory molecule in the induction of the cell-mediated tumour immune response. In this study, various sunscreen ingredients were tested for their ability to inhibit the production of NO. Four of the five sunscreens tested directly inhibited the conversion of arginine to citrulline by inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) in vitro. These findings suggest that sunscreens may prevent redness partly by UV absorption and partly by inhibition of the skin's inflammatory response. As such, sunscreens might promote instead of protect against melanoma."
I did hear something like this a number of years ago. Looks like a damned if you do, damned if you don’t kind of situation. Seem either way you will get cancer. At least with the sunscreen, you won’t get fried! Makes you think that long sleeve pants and shirts with a wide brim hat is the best choice.sunscreens might promote instead of protect against melanoma.
I think if your theory were true I would not have had skin cancer at all. I hardly touched sunscreen as a kid. I still got a large spot on my back, and only as a kid did I ever expose my back (wore a halter top all summer) - as an adult I have always worn shirts. I am not a habitual swimmer (maybe ten or fifteen visits to swimming pools in DECADES) and always, always always always cover up.Zoltan wrote:
I don't fear the sun and try to spend 20 minutes a day as exposed as possible. It provides the most assimilable form of Vitamin D and is a big mood elevator. I am fair skinned and have had a lot of burns my whole life but since I started doing small doses every day, I no longer burn easily. Extreme situations like last June of course will still require a good sunscreen, but in everyday life, I can handle a lot more sun without burning. I still get checked yearly by a dermatologist.
I also cannot help but think that our species has been living under this same sun for millions of years, and only in the past 50 or so have we seen this surge in skin cancers. I have to believe there is something else at work in concert with sun exposure: chemicals in the sunscreens themselves? free radicals produced from a diet high in polyunsaturated fats? Chemicals in plastics? I have no idea, but it's an interesting speculation.
This article is from 2005 and was accurate for the time. At that time very few sunscreens had the ingredients necessary for broad spectrum protection, including the UVA/long rays that promote skin cancers. Old sunblocks prevented sunburn but probably not cancer. Since then a growing number of sunblocks have added ingredients to expand the spectrum they block and now do offer protection against cancer promoting rays. However, you have to know what the ingredients are and read the label, because many sunscreens don't have them, and the SPF factor only measures UVB protection.fishmonger wrote: As such, sunscreens might promote instead of protect against melanoma."