Rae Lakes Loop Paradise Valley Bridge

Questions and reports related to Sierra Nevada current and forecast conditions, as well as general precautions and safety information. Trail conditions, fire/smoke reports, mosquito reports, weather and snow conditions, stream crossing information, and more.
User avatar
Wandering Daisy
Topix Docent
Posts: 4189
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 8:19 pm
Experience: N/A
Location: Fair Oaks CA (Sacramento area)
Contact:

Re: Rae Lakes Loop Paradise Valley Bridge

Post by Wandering Daisy » Mon Mar 11, 2019 9:38 am

I do not blame the park service for being liability adverse, given people's tendencies to sue nowadays. A Yosemite ranger once discussed the liability issue. Other than environmental regulations (such as having to use a poop tube on a big wall climb and areas closed for bird nesting), regulations are hands-off with respect to rock climbing risks. Once they start to regulate, they become liable. Yosemite has a lot of bridges, most installed before the wilderness designation. SEKI less so. Each of those structures has a liability potential. Once a bridge or zip line is installed, they become liable for any defects that cause injury or death. If you die wading, you knew it was risky and they are not responsible for your bad decision.

I personally do not feel entitled to ANY bridges in the wilderness. That is not saying I do not appreciate a bridge when it exists. There are only a handful of bridges in the Wind Rivers and I simply work around existing conditions when I plan a trip.








User avatar
rightstar76
Topix Expert
Posts: 627
Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2006 3:22 pm
Experience: N/A

Re: Rae Lakes Loop Paradise Valley Bridge

Post by rightstar76 » Mon Mar 11, 2019 2:43 pm

Ok, so if it's a money issue and Sequoia Parks Conservancy holds a fundraiser, the money can go to rebuilding the bridge? So that becomes complicated because 1) first, we don't know the issue that is holding up the rebuilding of the bridge and 2) assuming it's money, what are the rules pertaining to funds going to projects like this? Even if the conservancy could raise the money, would it be within the conservancy's framework for wilderness bridges or would that money have to be used for other types of projects like front country visitor centers? This is why transparency is so important. Without knowledge of what's happening, it's difficult to find out what options we have.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests