Ursack approved in Inyo Forest?

Share your advice and personal experiences, post a gear review or ask any questions you may have pertaining to outdoor gear and equipment.
User avatar
wanderin.jack
Topix Acquainted
Posts: 82
Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2013 4:21 pm
Experience: N/A

Ursack approved in Inyo Forest?

Post by wanderin.jack »

I'm really not some anti-govt wacko type but jeez man, read this from a ranger: http://www.ursack.com/ursack-update.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;. These regs make about as much sense as "boil water for 5 minutes" to purify it. Total crazy bs in the Sierra. No one can carry that much fuel. The nps and usfs gets wacked out of shape when someone doesn't close an URSACK properly and their is a problem with the equipment but when a hikers don't close lids properly on a conventional canister and the bear tips that over (as a bear around thousand is lake has been been) they pass on that as being a user error and not a problem with the canister. Seems all the same to me.

I think the official position is that there is no official position at this time, I.e limbo. I bought mine the one year they were "legal" whatever that means and some bozo didn't close one right and got cleaned out. I'm not that person. Until someone can show me in the federal registry that I can't use an URSACK I am going to do so and I'm going to use it properly along with other proper precautions a prudent person should take in bear country. The problem is "used properly" by the lowest common denominator, I.e. The person that really shouldn't be out there in the first place and also catches their face on fire with their alcohol stove. I'm not the person they are worried about.





Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Wanderin' Jack
User avatar
Rockchucker
Topix Expert
Posts: 407
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2013 5:22 pm
Experience: N/A
Location: Bishop, CA

Re: Ursack approved in Inyo Forest?

Post by Rockchucker »

I just went into the ranger station here in Bishop and the first person told me no they are not allowed, then they called the main office and recanted their statement. The Urasack is legal in all of Inyo National forest although they arn't effective. Weird response but looks like they are ok.
I'm no suture for my future.
User avatar
oldranger
Topix Addict
Posts: 2861
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 9:18 pm
Experience: N/A
Location: Bend, Oregon

Re: Ursack approved in Inyo Forest?

Post by oldranger »

My take on the situation and I hope George steps in if I am wrong is that the problem with the Ursack (I own 4, by the way) is that they are subject to user error much more often than canisters, enough so that bears are rewarded enough that they are not deterred from trying. Much the same way that counter balancing did not work--counter balancing always worked for me-- and still does where permitted--a 2 ounce bag that gets smaller as the trip continues outweighs the time costs of doing it right. And since canisters are being used by the masses the odds of a bear in the camp have been greatly reduced over the 1980's.

In Yosemite I use my canister.

Finally, as I recall the superintendent of a national park can make special regs that can be enforced consequently the regs requiring canisters on the Rae lakes loop and the woods creek drainage in SEKI. Also if I recall correctly an Ursack must be counterbalanced in SEKI to be legal.

Mike
Mike

Who can't do everything he used to and what he can do takes a hell of a lot longer!
User avatar
AlmostThere
Topix Addict
Posts: 2724
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 4:38 pm
Experience: Level 4 Explorer

Re: Ursack approved in Inyo Forest?

Post by AlmostThere »

Yosemite rangers have told me horror stories. I'll keep my canister.

I don't think anything a habituated bear can get its teeth into is worth it. They'll get torn open, just like the ones I've seen pictures of - some of the pics are here in this forum.
User avatar
maverick
Forums Moderator
Forums Moderator
Posts: 11821
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 5:54 pm
Experience: Level 4 Explorer

Re: Ursack approved in Inyo Forest?

Post by maverick »

Those of you who do carry a Ursack, have two myself which were used for overflow
and above treeline against small critters, have you had a bear attempt to get into
your Ursack? Have seen the aftermath of such an incident, and even though the bear
was not successful at tearing it open, everything was crushed and mangled in the
sack, and lets not even start about all the bear saliva all over the sack, gross, it sure
wouldn't be going back into my backpack after that.
Professional Sierra Landscape Photographer

I don't give out specific route information, my belief is that it takes away from the whole adventure spirit of a trip, if you need every inch planned out, you'll have to get that from someone else.

Have a safer backcountry experience by using the HST ReConn Form 2.0, named after Larry Conn, a HST member: http://reconn.org
User avatar
oldranger
Topix Addict
Posts: 2861
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 9:18 pm
Experience: N/A
Location: Bend, Oregon

Re: Ursack approved in Inyo Forest?

Post by oldranger »

Maverick

The only bear in the backcountry I have seen in the last 23 years has been in Pate Valley in 2009 when I camped there with you. That bear was never interested in our campsite. The canisters have been great in creating a lack of interest on the part of bears in campsites as a source of food. So nothing I use, including counterbalancing where legal has been challenged since 1990. Of course camping far away from trails helps. In 1990 a bear was interested in my food when horse camping at Vidette Meadow. Everything was in metal boxes secured by heavy leather straps but clearly not bear proof. When I heard the bear I put on my boots chased and cussed at the bear for about 200 yards and it never returned. But apparently it did hit some backpackers up at Vidette Lakes! When I was the ranger for ranger lakes area every August a bear would travel between Ranger Lakes and Twin Lakes and hit camps in both areas on the same night.

Mike
Mike

Who can't do everything he used to and what he can do takes a hell of a lot longer!
User avatar
longri
Topix Fanatic
Posts: 1082
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2012 9:13 am
Experience: N/A

Re: Ursack approved in Inyo Forest?

Post by longri »

I also have Ursacks and have used them where it was legal and also at times illegally as a temporary overflow for when my food wouldn't fit in the canister. I have not had a bear try to get into one. The only time I know of where a bear tried to get my food was when I was counter-balancing over near Mammoth about 25 years ago.

My untested theory with the Ursack is that by keeping it tied to an immovable object near where I'm sleeping I will be awakened by a bear attempting to get the food. The Ursack, while not 100% bear-proof, should last long enough for me to chase the bear away. I might then be up all night. It isn't a perfect solution but there's no way I'm going to carry two canisters or go hungry.

As for crushed food by a bear? In order to get all my food in a canister it has to be pre-crushed anyway.

I prefer the Ursack in most areas as I almost never see bears but I understand the reasons for the policy. It's kind of like herd immunity with vaccines.
User avatar
markskor
Founding Member - RIP
Posts: 2442
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 5:41 pm
Experience: Level 4 Explorer
Location: Crowley Lake and Tuolumne Meadows

Re: Ursack approved in Inyo Forest?

Post by markskor »

Thoughts...
While still not officially approved for use, (See the "Look the other way" situation now seemingly in place), It would appear that Ursack use could be widespread this season - or at least until some official edict again bans their use.
Personally, I find those using Ursacks in the High Sierra selfish. Why invite a bear into camp...if not yours, the next guys? Hard-sided cans work - the bear learns/has learned to recognize futility in even bothering with them - If used correctly, a proven efective deterrent.

Ursacks, while also highly effective, still allow the bear a taste...It might take a while but a hungry bear, working on a un-supervised Ursack, makes visible progress, learns that there is hope. Having seen multiple chewed-up, slobbered on, mangled food bags - dinners crushed and no longer edible - maybe the bear only partially won, but the fear is that he has learned to return.

While not fearing the bear per se, still, incidents of bear-human confrontations will undoubtedly increase.
Repeat bears, those learned, get tagged; some eventually get put down.
Mountainman who swims with trout
User avatar
maverick
Forums Moderator
Forums Moderator
Posts: 11821
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 5:54 pm
Experience: Level 4 Explorer

Re: Ursack approved in Inyo Forest?

Post by maverick »

Oldranger wrote:
The only bear in the backcountry I have seen in the last 23 years has been in Pate Valley
in 2009 when I camped there with you.
I have never seen a bear while traveling crosscountry (off trail), have seen paw prints of
bear and mountain lion, but that's it. Have had a few encounters while traveling on trail
in the backcountry like the one in Pate Valley, also at Rancheria Creek, Grizzly Lakes,
Paradise Valley, 1000 Is Lake and East Lake. The Ursack incident occured at 1000 Is Lake.
Professional Sierra Landscape Photographer

I don't give out specific route information, my belief is that it takes away from the whole adventure spirit of a trip, if you need every inch planned out, you'll have to get that from someone else.

Have a safer backcountry experience by using the HST ReConn Form 2.0, named after Larry Conn, a HST member: http://reconn.org
User avatar
maverick
Forums Moderator
Forums Moderator
Posts: 11821
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 5:54 pm
Experience: Level 4 Explorer

Re: Ursack approved in Inyo Forest?

Post by maverick »

Longri wrote:
My untested theory with the Ursack is that by keeping it tied to an immovable object near
where I'm sleeping I will be awakened by a bear attempting to get the food.
That may work in some cases, but it depends on which of you are more determined.
A friend of mine who was camping between Garnet and 1000 Is Lake was hit in the
middle of the night. They tried to get the sack away from the bear by making noise,
throwing objects near it, but the bear did not pay them any attention. Only when they
finally started a fire did the bear release the sack and run off, this ordeal lasted about
an hour. Everthing in their sack was crushed, and the bag had saliva and blood all over
it, with 3 days left of their trip they decided to hike back to the car at Agnew Meadows.
Professional Sierra Landscape Photographer

I don't give out specific route information, my belief is that it takes away from the whole adventure spirit of a trip, if you need every inch planned out, you'll have to get that from someone else.

Have a safer backcountry experience by using the HST ReConn Form 2.0, named after Larry Conn, a HST member: http://reconn.org
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests