Sierra Challenge 2013

Topics related to peak bagging, rock climbing and bouldering in the foothills and high country of the Sierra Nevada. Be sure to also check out the Information Booth forum category to learn from / see if you can contribute to a profile for High Sierra 13'ers, 14'ers and cross country passes.
User avatar
orbitor
Topix Regular
Posts: 121
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2012 8:36 am
Experience: Level 4 Explorer
Location: Bishop, CA

Re: Sierra Challenge 2013

Post by orbitor »

That's true. I suppose you could go to ten different trailheads and climb ten different peaks and never even see any of the other participants!
Agreed, but that would defeat the purpose of the challenge. I think it's ok to make a few substitutions as long you do most of the 'menu' for that particular year. Luckily for me, I have no ambitions to be one of the top competitors, thus doing just two days provides enough satisfaction - even when hiking with Bob's group for only one of those!
Climbing | Community | Adventure | Life
http://www.sierramountaineeringclub.org
User avatar
mbrown
Topix Newbie
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2011 5:04 pm
Experience: N/A

Re: Sierra Challenge 2013

Post by mbrown »

I am an occasional backpacker and peak climber (usually with quide). I used to enjoy reading
bob burds descriptions of the sierra challenges. A few years ago, a woman participant fell off
a ridge during the competition and was very lucky to escape with relatively minor injuries.
A competition where people are perhaps going to push themselves far beyond their comfort
zone and where mistakes could be lead to great bodily harm or worse
is what I would call "intense". I used to regularly train for marathons with much better runners.
If I couldnt keep up, no matter how hard I tried, I would either slow down or stop and perhaps
jog back to my car. The idea of trying to keep up with extremely talented rock climbers/hikers
miles into the backcountry until you are no longer thinking straight again is "intense". It would
be interesting to hear what the "pros" think when somebody who obviously has no business
starting this challenge appears at the start.
User avatar
Mike M.
Topix Expert
Posts: 647
Joined: Fri May 25, 2007 10:50 pm
Experience: Level 4 Explorer
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Sierra Challenge 2013

Post by Mike M. »

I enjoy reading Bob Burd's trip reports and admire him a great deal, but he's a crazy man! I don't understand his "in-and-out" philosophy of climbing that sees him on the trail in the wee hours of the morning, well before sunrise, death marching to his chosen conquest of the day, only to return 18 hours later, usually after sunset, to a godforsaken motel bed. What's up with that?

My approach to the backcountry is the opposite: I prefer to immerse myself for weeks at a time, without resupply. I like to explore out-of-the-way places that catch my interest back at home where I pour over old topos and imagine potential routes. Kick back and enjoy the beauty, take my time. I'm not into peak bagging and don't keep a bucket list.

That said, Bob is fitness machine and his trip reports are a valuable resource for people like me who want to see what a certain route might look like. But I think he'd enjoy it more if he buried himself in the backcountry for a couple of weeks rather than pop in and out every 24 hours.

Each to his own, I guess.

Kudos to Bob, but man, he's crazy for sure!

Mike
User avatar
orbitor
Topix Regular
Posts: 121
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2012 8:36 am
Experience: Level 4 Explorer
Location: Bishop, CA

Re: Sierra Challenge 2013

Post by orbitor »

mbrown wrote:I am an occasional backpacker and peak climber (usually with quide). I used to enjoy reading
bob burds descriptions of the sierra challenges. A few years ago, a woman participant fell off
a ridge during the competition and was very lucky to escape with relatively minor injuries.
A competition where people are perhaps going to push themselves far beyond their comfort
zone and where mistakes could be lead to great bodily harm or worse
is what I would call "intense". I used to regularly train for marathons with much better runners.
If I couldnt keep up, no matter how hard I tried, I would either slow down or stop and perhaps
jog back to my car. The idea of trying to keep up with extremely talented rock climbers/hikers
miles into the backcountry until you are no longer thinking straight again is "intense". It would
be interesting to hear what the "pros" think when somebody who obviously has no business
starting this challenge appears at the start.
mbrown
It's understood that this activity is "intense;" signing up for participation implies acknowledgement of the risks associated with it, including, as you mention, great bodily harm and even death. Bob Burd has clear disclaimers on his site - reading them takes only minutes.

Furthermore, I don't look on the Sierra Challenge as a win-at-any-cost competition. I don't think any participant will drive themselves to utter exhaustion or go on a suicidal climb for that extra summit. Plenty of people, including some I know and even Bob himself, have turned back because of weather, bad route choice, etc. It is a competition, yes, but ultimately the reason why all these crazies are out there is to enjoy the Sierra just like everyone else, albeit at a faster pace.

Those who really look to compete will be at an extremely advanced conditioning and technical level. They are well aware of the effort that is required to keep up with the 'guru' and with one another. As for the "amateurs," like me, we are in it simply for the experience. KNOW YOUR LIMITS is the mantra and I certainly have no qualms about turning back when my abilities are exceeded. I would expect the others to employ the same logic, which is why I have no problems with this competition as long as every person takes responsibility for their own actions and theirs alone.
Climbing | Community | Adventure | Life
http://www.sierramountaineeringclub.org
User avatar
Ken M
Topix Acquainted
Posts: 35
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2013 3:26 pm
Experience: N/A

Re: Sierra Challenge 2013

Post by Ken M »

oldranger wrote:This is not a criticism but just a reflection I have had for a long time. Why do people need or want to follow "challenges" challenges established by someone else. Just never understood need/desire to thru hike, do Halfdome, or any number of "in" things.

To me the challege is to discover, on my own or through querying friends, obsecure places and spending time becoming inimate with an area. Sort of like the difference between a one night stand and a committed relationship.

Mike
I dunno, Mike. It sort of seems like your last sentence contradicts your first.
User avatar
sekihiker
Founding Member
Posts: 956
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 2:47 pm
Experience: Level 4 Explorer
Location: Fresno
Contact:

Re: Sierra Challenge 2013

Post by sekihiker »

When he first started doing his dayhike "death marches" Bob didn't have a lot of time off from his job to do it any other way. I don't know if he has more time off now, but he likes the format. I admire the commitment he has put into his efforts. Few of us have the conditioning to do it Bob's way.
User avatar
quietone
Topix Novice
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Apr 21, 2013 11:54 am
Experience: N/A

Re: Sierra Challenge 2013

Post by quietone »

personally, i think it would be really cool to play with a group of like minded people and grab a few tops. i hope to have a few days off from work this year and join the fun
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests