Judge rejects Bush plan to log in Sequoia National Monument | High Sierra Topix  

Judge rejects Bush plan to log in Sequoia National Monument

Grab your bear can or camp chair, kick your feet up and chew the fat about anything Sierra Nevada related that doesn't quite fit in any of the other forums. Within reason, (and the HST rules and guidelines) this is also an anything goes forum. Tell stories, discuss wilderness issues, music, or whatever else the High Sierra stirs up in your mind.

Judge rejects Bush plan to log in Sequoia National Monument

Postby copeg » Wed Aug 23, 2006 10:27 am

Judge rejects Bush plan to log in Sequoia National Monument
Associated Press
SAN FRANCISCO - A federal judge on Tuesday blocked a Bush administration plan to allow commercial logging in Giant Sequoia National Monument, home to two-thirds of the world's largest trees.

U.S. District Judge Charles R. Breyer sided with state Attorney General Bill Lockyer and environmental groups that sued the U.S. Forest Service over plans to permit timber cuts on up to 3,200 acres each year in the 328,000-acre preserve, home to 38 sequoia groves in Central California.

"The Forest Service's interest in harvesting timber has trampled the applicable environmental laws," Breyer wrote, calling the agency's forest management plan "incomprehensible."

In lawsuits filed last year, Lockyer and conservation groups said the agency's plan, issued in January 2004, violated the proclamation signed by President Clinton in 2000 that established the national monument to protect sequoias, which can grow up to 270 feet tall and 30 feet in diameter.

The plaintiffs argued the plan failed to consider its environmental impacts as required by the National Environmental Policy Act, calling it as a scientifically suspect strategy meant to satisfy the timber industry under the guise of wildfire prevention.

The plan would have allowed up to 7.5 million board feet of timber - enough to fill 1,500 logging trucks - to be removed each year from the monument in Sierra Nevada, the plaintiffs said.

In September last year, Breyer issued a preliminary injunction to halt logging in the national monument that began two months earlier. Tuesday's ruling makes the injunction permanent and forces the Forest Service to develop a new management plan.

"We think today's ruling is a huge step toward more intelligent, more protective management of the monument," said Pat Gallagher, the Sierra Club's director of environmental law. "It deserves to be managed like the national treasure that it is."

The conservation groups urged the Bush administration to restore and protect the monument, carved out of the 1.1 million-acre Sequoia National Forest, to the same standard as neighboring Sequoia National Park.

"We simply cannot afford to sacrifice for short-term gain majestic sequoias that have stood for centuries," Lockyer said in a statement. "Today's ruling helps ensure these state gems will be standing for generations to come."

The Forest Service was "very disappointed" in Breyer's ruling and would talk to Justice Department attorneys to determine its next move, which could include appealing the ruling to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, said spokesman Matt Mathes.

The plan to allow logging of trees up to 30 inches in diameter was aimed at protecting the sequoia trees from wildfire, Mathes said. He stressed that the Forest Service had no plans to allow logging of giant sequoias.

Over the years, fire suppression efforts had allowed the sequoia forests to become overgrown with smaller trees that can catch fire and put the giant trees at risk, Mathes said.

"When the smaller diameter trees catch fire, that's the one thing that can kill the giant sequoia trees towering above them," Mathes said. "We need to take another look at how we're going to manage this monument to protect these magnificent trees from fire."

The cases are Sierra Club v. Bosworth, 05-00397, and Lockyer v. U.S. Forest Service, 05-00898.


Giant Sequoia National Monument: http://www.fs.fed.us/r5/sequoia/gsnm.html

User avatar
Founding Member & Forums Administrator
Founding Member & Forums Administrator
Posts: 2010
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 9:25 pm
Location: Menlo Park, CA
Experience: Level 4 Explorer

Postby caddis » Wed Aug 23, 2006 7:57 pm

User avatar
Founding Member
Posts: 229
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 7:01 pm
Location: Lemoore
Experience: N/A

Postby AldeFarte » Wed Aug 23, 2006 10:00 pm

Sounds like a broken record for caliscrewya. More ignorance running amuck. THE FOREST SERVICE IS TRYING TO MANAGE THE AREA FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE RESOURCE FROM CATASTROPHIC FIRE! More "dirty deeds done dirt cheap". [By corrupt judicial bureaucrats] jls
User avatar
Topix Regular
Posts: 215
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 10:46 pm
Location: Eklutna, Ak.
Experience: N/A

Postby dave54 » Thu Aug 24, 2006 12:19 pm

Judge Beyer admitted he did not even bother to read the technical analysis and just relied on the briefs submitted by the club sierra. This only verifies what most here already know -- the sierra club is no longer an enviromental group and has degenerated into just another left-wing political group, and breyer is in their pocket.

The tree size limit of 9 inches has no scientific basis whatsoever -- NONE. It is political/economic. Current sawmill technology makes trees under 10" dbh uneconomical to harvest. So the FS would have to PAY a contractor to remove trees under 10". This would bolster the false club sierra claim that harvesting on public land costs money. There is no doubt that as mill technology improves and smaller sawlogs become economical, the club sierra will lower their dbh threshold again.

Note that the club sierra has steadfastly refused to defend their 'no commercial harvest' policy in a public debate against recognized scientists and natural resource professionals. They are afraid to. They will be exposed for what they are -- charlatans who hide their socialist agenda in a green smoke screen.
Log off and get outdoors!
User avatar
Founding Member
Posts: 968
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 10:24 pm
Location: where the Sierras, Cascades, and Great Basin meet.
Experience: Level 4 Explorer

Return to The Campfire

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: MountainMinstrel and 1 guest