Politics, Backpacking, Sierra

Grab your bear can or camp chair, kick your feet up and chew the fat about anything Sierra Nevada related that doesn't quite fit in any of the other forums. Within reason, (and the HST rules and guidelines) this is also an anything goes forum. Tell stories, discuss wilderness issues, music, or whatever else the High Sierra stirs up in your mind.
User avatar
rlown
Topix Docent
Posts: 8225
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 5:00 pm
Experience: Level 4 Explorer
Location: Wilton, CA

Re: Politics, Backpacking, Sierra

Post by rlown »

maybe off topic but I'd really like to see 168 completed. No worse then what they did in Glacier.
User avatar
oldranger
Topix Addict
Posts: 2861
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 9:18 pm
Experience: N/A
Location: Bend, Oregon

Re: Politics, Backpacking, Sierra

Post by oldranger »

Russ,

Not only no but F--- NO!

Mike
Mike

Who can't do everything he used to and what he can do takes a hell of a lot longer!
User avatar
rlown
Topix Docent
Posts: 8225
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 5:00 pm
Experience: Level 4 Explorer
Location: Wilton, CA

Re: Politics, Backpacking, Sierra

Post by rlown »

think of the economic benefits. to the area.

capitalism is a cancer or it doesn't work!

That would employ like 5 geologists and major road crews which seems to be the favor right now in CA.
User avatar
ERIC
Your Humble Host & Forums Administrator
Your Humble Host & Forums Administrator
Posts: 3254
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 9:13 am
Experience: Level 4 Explorer
Location: between the 916 and 661

Re: Politics, Backpacking, Sierra

Post by ERIC »

oldranger wrote:Russ,

Not only no but F--- NO!

Mike
+1

Original plan to complete 168 included reservoirs flooding out Blayney and Evolution Valleys, just to name two areas worth protecting, IMO.

And what I find ironic about Mike's earlier point (if this is true), it's my understanding that Reagan was the Gov. to stop 168 expansion in it's tracks before it could even reach Kaiser Pass. That's what I've read, anyway. I'm too young to remember. :D
New members, please consider giving us an intro!
Follow us on Twitter @HighSierraTopix. Use hashtags #SIERRAPHILE #GotSierra? #GotMountains?
Follow us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/HighSierraTopix
User avatar
rlown
Topix Docent
Posts: 8225
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 5:00 pm
Experience: Level 4 Explorer
Location: Wilton, CA

Re: Politics, Backpacking, Sierra

Post by rlown »

if i could find the original plan, that would be helpful. Google search seems to just show what it is today.

I still see nothing wrong with completing that road, sans the reservoirs. no different than 120 or others in the NPS system. And it'll be closed most of the year anyway. A wtf doesn't answer why.

Eric, glad you added to your comment cuz i was going right there. One needs more info to make the actual determination.

Russ
User avatar
ERIC
Your Humble Host & Forums Administrator
Your Humble Host & Forums Administrator
Posts: 3254
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 9:13 am
Experience: Level 4 Explorer
Location: between the 916 and 661

Re: Politics, Backpacking, Sierra

Post by ERIC »

Even without reservoirs, I prefer to hike to those two beautiful locations. Not drive to them. Among other popular backcountry routes, methinks it sure would make the North Lake - South Lake loop a 'different' experience. No thanks.
New members, please consider giving us an intro!
Follow us on Twitter @HighSierraTopix. Use hashtags #SIERRAPHILE #GotSierra? #GotMountains?
Follow us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/HighSierraTopix
User avatar
gdurkee
Founding Member
Posts: 774
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 8:20 pm
Experience: N/A

Re: Politics, Backpacking, Sierra

Post by gdurkee »

Eeeeek. Completing 168 would have been -- and would still be -- an absolute disaster for the wilderness character of that entire region. Reagan did stop it -- not because he cared about the wilderness (though some say he actually did) but because it would have cost too much and for very little return.

Look at the areas that do have trans Sierra highways and there's not a huge amount of economic development as a result, once you get above about 4,000 feet and especially on the east side. Look at current development above Twain Harte (108) or Arnold (4). Shaver has a pretty good road to it, but try finding a place to eat after October 1. Lee Vining's stayed about the same size since forever. Minden etc. don't benefit a whole lot from even an all year highway. From Mono Lake south, there's no water to support development, so effects are limited right there.

A side note: You can still see the large blazes SCE chopped onto trees (in the 30s??) at Evolution Meadow and Colby to show the rough placement of dams.

g.
User avatar
rlown
Topix Docent
Posts: 8225
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 5:00 pm
Experience: Level 4 Explorer
Location: Wilton, CA

Re: Politics, Backpacking, Sierra

Post by rlown »

yeah.. never said it would be an all year highway. it'd have the same character as 120, which obviously must have some economic benefit given the push to open it every year.
User avatar
gdurkee
Founding Member
Posts: 774
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 8:20 pm
Experience: N/A

Re: Politics, Backpacking, Sierra

Post by gdurkee »

Ha! The legendary Gene Rose weighs in with a quick reply to me:
I was there...more or less. Yes, SCE wanted dams in Evolution and over on their West side with Granite Creek and other spots above Clover Meadow.

In the post WWII road-building craze several Sierra road projects were advanced. There was a big fight in Kings Canyon because the Sierra Club saw an extension of 180 to Cedar Grove and Zumwalt Meadow as a staged trans-Sierra route to Alpendale, west of Bishop. If you go west out of Bishop, the highway is even designated as 168.

There was also talk of a Theodore Solomon route that would run in the front country of the west slope of the Sierra.

The North Fork to Mammoth, via Minaret Summit or Mammoth Pass, was the contentious one. It was even staked around 1959, but Ike Livermore, Governor Reagan's resource secretary and Whitney packer, recommended against it...and Reagan took his advice. Reagan later claimed it was his proudest moment as governor. Yes, cost was a concern but the political will was big issue. As I recall even the folks around Mammoth were opposed to it because they didn't have the infrastructure to support the anticipated visitation.

At one time, the folks at Mammoth, Bob Schott, asked me to do a book on it, but realizing the limited market I could not find a publisher. My files on this project are in Special Collections at the CSUF Madden Library.
User avatar
tomba
Topix Regular
Posts: 375
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2011 12:50 pm
Experience: Level 4 Explorer
Location: Bay Area

Re: Politics, Backpacking, Sierra

Post by tomba »

Here is an old map showing apparently hand-drawn reservoirs in Blaney Meadows, Lake Florence, and Vermilion Valley.
-- Found trash? Please pack it out. Thank you.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 25 guests