HST Community      Politics, Backpacking, Sierra

Politics, Backpacking, Sierra | High Sierra Topix  

Politics, Backpacking, Sierra

Grab your bear can or camp chair, kick your feet up and chew the fat about anything Sierra Nevada related that doesn't quite fit in any of the other forums. Within reason, (and the HST rules and guidelines) this is also an anything goes forum. Tell stories, discuss wilderness issues, music, or whatever else the High Sierra stirs up in your mind.

Politics, Backpacking, Sierra

Postby maverick » Sat Mar 02, 2013 10:48 am

During your backpacking careers which political party has served you better as
a backpacker? Which president has done the most to protect the Sierra and its
environment? Give example of what they did. Do any state/county representatives
that you know of stand out when it come to protecting the Sierra? If yes, name
them and their party, and what they did to protect or better the Sierra.
I don't give out specific route information, my belief is that it takes away from the whole adventure spirit of a trip, if you need every inch planned out, you'll have to get that from someone else.

Have a safer backcountry experience by using the HST ReConn Form 2.0, named after Larry Conn, a HST member: http://reconn.org



User avatar
maverick
Forums Moderator
Forums Moderator
 
Posts: 9310
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 4:54 pm
Experience: Level 4 Explorer

Re: Politics, Backpacking, Sierra

Postby Tom » Sun Mar 03, 2013 10:08 am

This would not be be a direct answer...mostly because I shy away from political discussions.

However, For awhile I had a re-occurring dream that I was backpacking north of the Brooks Range. Many days out I came across a camp that was sheltered in a small grove of stunted trees and was guarded by several men in suits. Turns out that they are secret service for former President Jimmy Carter.

He, along with Rosalind, are checking out an area that he had designated as wilderness. The wilderness act never really happened but the dream seems real and after fishing (for grayling) and swapping stories with the "Prez" I move on to another camp.

Real or not it was one of the good dreams. It beats the one where I'm standing on top of the pyramid, dressed in a robe and very tiny people are throwing gherkins at me (apologies to Val Kilmer).

Should we ask what religion has helped out in the wilderness?
User avatar
Tom
Topix Acquainted
 
Posts: 64
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 8:55 am
Location: Santa Maria, CA
Experience: N/A

Re: Politics, Backpacking, Sierra

Postby rlown » Sun Mar 03, 2013 10:37 am

Hey Mav,

Why not kick it off with an personal example.

I have a few ideas on the topic: Why is Hetch Hetchy still there? Why didn't 168 get built over all the way through; 120 did and a NPS is by definition wilderness, so how is it different? Then there's the Sierra Club. I never liked them, but they have done some good work.

It really doesn't seem to be about a president. It all comes down to money.

I knew a ranger in Moke who would just "show up" wherever i seemed to be going. Ranger Rick (yes no joke). He personally expanded that wilderness in the mid/late 70's. Seems those are more the heroes we should be looking for.
User avatar
rlown
Topix Junkie
 
Posts: 6449
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 4:00 pm
Location: Petaluma, CA
Experience: Level 4 Explorer

Re: Politics, Backpacking, Sierra

Postby sparky » Sun Mar 03, 2013 1:52 pm

I honestly don't know enough about these things to have a passionate opinion one way or the other, I am just very skeptical, jaded, suspicious when it comes to money and power.

I don't trust red or blue. I see them both as a giant clusterfuck of smoke and mirrors.

I do appreciate that the Sierra has been well protected. I will always do what I can to keep it that way. I honestly don't care who has done what in the past, because right now both parties are completely broken

? Then there's the Sierra Club. I never liked them, but they have done some good work.

It really doesn't seem to be about a president. It all comes down to money.
:thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:
User avatar
sparky
Topix Expert
 
Posts: 915
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 9:01 am
Experience: N/A

Re: Politics, Backpacking, Sierra

Postby Rockchucker » Sun Mar 03, 2013 4:54 pm

I personally distrust both sides. I truly feel we are being duped by corporate America. Big money rules all. The parties are nothing but puppets.
I'm no suture for my future.
User avatar
Rockchucker
Topix Expert
 
Posts: 407
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2013 4:22 pm
Location: Bishop, CA
Experience: N/A

Re: Politics, Backpacking, Sierra

Postby dave54 » Sun Mar 03, 2013 6:35 pm

Local citizenry working for a common cause has done more than either poltical party. Or should I phrase it as in spite of either politcal party.
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Log off and get outdoors!
~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=
User avatar
dave54
Founding Member
 
Posts: 887
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 9:24 pm
Location: where the Sierras, Cascades, and Great Basin meet.
Experience: Level 4 Explorer

Re: Politics, Backpacking, Sierra

Postby oldranger » Mon Mar 04, 2013 8:26 am

Teddy!

Mike
Mike

Who can't do everything he used to and what he can do takes a hell of a lot longer!
User avatar
oldranger
Topix Junkie
 
Posts: 2397
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 8:18 pm
Location: Bend, Oregon
Experience: N/A

Re: Politics, Backpacking, Sierra

Postby balzaccom » Mon Mar 04, 2013 10:50 am

Think globally, act locally. Do what you can that will do the most good for the region you love...and hope/support others to do the same.

Which might be a good secondary topic for these boards. Who is doing good work in your area to preserve the wilderness that you love? I'll suggest one--an NGO (non-governmental agency) that is working to protect the Sierra:

http://www.cserc.org/index.html
Balzaccom

check out our website: http://www.backpackthesierra.com/
User avatar
balzaccom
Topix Fanatic
 
Posts: 1455
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2008 8:22 pm
Experience: N/A

Re: Politics, Backpacking, Sierra

Postby dave54 » Mon Mar 04, 2013 8:58 pm

oldranger wrote:Teddy!

Mike


I take it you are referring to the President Teddy. He is an odd choice for a hero to the environmental industry. His autobiography details his philosophy on land management issues. He created the National Forests not to 'protect' them from private timber companies. Exactly the opposite. The timber barons were not developing the federally owned timber lands. They were intentionally making them off limits to create a cartel where the timber companies controlled prices through controlling supply. Teddy created the national forests to hasten their utilization and provide an economic base for rural communities (read the Organic Act), and moved them from Interior to Agriculture to get them out of the political cronyism and corruption of Interior. He created the National Wildlife Refuges to maintain wildlife populations for hunting, not protecting wildlife from hunting. His national monuments were to create a tourism economy for local communities, besides his interest in preserving history.

If Teddy were president today the the environmental industry would be excoriating him for his land management policies.
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Log off and get outdoors!
~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=
User avatar
dave54
Founding Member
 
Posts: 887
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 9:24 pm
Location: where the Sierras, Cascades, and Great Basin meet.
Experience: Level 4 Explorer

Re: Politics, Backpacking, Sierra

Postby oldranger » Mon Mar 04, 2013 11:06 pm

Dave

Ah the point is not what he intended but the consequences of his actions. Probably would not have been a lot left to protect under the Wilderness Act without National Forests in the first place.

Mike
Last edited by oldranger on Tue Mar 05, 2013 9:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
Mike

Who can't do everything he used to and what he can do takes a hell of a lot longer!
User avatar
oldranger
Topix Junkie
 
Posts: 2397
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 8:18 pm
Location: Bend, Oregon
Experience: N/A

Next

Return to The Campfire



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest