State wildlife officials oppose protection for pika | High Sierra Topix  

State wildlife officials oppose protection for pika

Grab your bear can or camp chair, kick your feet up and chew the fat about anything Sierra Nevada related that doesn't quite fit in any of the other forums. Within reason, (and the HST rules and guidelines) this is also an anything goes forum. Tell stories, discuss wilderness issues, music, or whatever else the High Sierra stirs up in your mind.
User avatar

Re: State wildlife officials oppose protection for pika

Postby BSquared » Mon Feb 25, 2008 6:24 am

You make an excellent point, but as you say, the picture is global, not local. I think a listing (like for the polar bear) would be just one more nail in the coffin of the idea that global climate isn't real, isn't important, or isn't something we should be doing anything about. That would be a good thing, but it would help the pika only in the long term.



User avatar
BSquared
Founding Member
 
Posts: 871
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2005 3:31 pm
Location: Jericho, VT
Experience: Level 3 Backpacker

User avatar

State wildlife officials deny protection to pika

Postby ERIC » Fri Apr 11, 2008 3:07 pm

State wildlife officials deny protection to pika

By Matt Weiser - mweiser@sacbee.com
Published 12:00 am PDT Friday, April 11, 2008


State wildlife officials rejected a bid Thursday to protect the American pika under the California Endangered Species Act, citing inadequate evidence that the rabbit relative is imperiled.

The fist-sized pika is the first species petitioned for protection under state law because of climate change.

It lives only on rocky slopes, generally above 8,000 feet in the Sierra Nevada. The Center for Biological Diversity had argued that global warming threatens to shrink pika habitat into ever-smaller islands, and may eventually drive the species to extinction.

The pika also is vulnerable to heat; prolonged exposure to temperatures over 77 degrees may be fatal.

Research in the Great Basin documented a decline in pika populations in Nevada and Oregon as a result of warmer weather. But similar research hasn't been done in California.

The Department of Fish and Game evaluated the petition and found little evidence that the pika is declining in California. Meeting in Bodega Bay, the Fish and Game Commission rejected the petition in a 4-0 vote, with one member absent.

"It strikes me that this petition isn't so much about pika as it is about the effect of climate change on alpine wildlife," said Commissioner Michael Sutton. "This threat is better dealt with in a much more comprehensive way."

Commissioners were also puzzled about how the pika could benefit from a decision to list the species under the Endangered Species Act. If the threat is climate change, they wondered, how would the act help prevent the pika's extinction?

Shaye Wolf, a biologist at the Center for Biological Diversity, said listing would allow the state to limit livestock grazing and road building in pika habitat, which also threaten the species. It would also compel the state, and the Department of Fish and Game in particular, to move faster to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, she said.

The act, she said, "gives the department direction to protect species from global warming as they would to any other threat. It does not discriminate among threats."

Wolf gave the commission an unpublished study by a doctoral candidate at Duke University showing that global warming will eliminate virtually all pika habitat in California by 2100, except for a relatively small patch in the Central Sierra near Yosemite National Park.

But Eric Loft, chief of the department's wildlife branch, said that study also failed to provide "on the ground" proof of a pika population decline in the Sierra.
New members, please consider giving us an intro!
Follow us on Twitter @HighSierraTopix. Use hashtags #SIERRAPHILE #GotSierra? #GotMountains?
Follow us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/HighSierraTopix
User avatar
ERIC
Your Humble Host & Forums Administrator
Your Humble Host & Forums Administrator
 
Posts: 2909
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 9:13 am
Location: between the 916 and 661
Experience: Level 4 Explorer

User avatar

Re: State wildlife officials oppose protection for pika

Postby rlown » Tue Sep 21, 2010 6:55 pm

not sure where Pika's stand today in terms of endangered.. They were screaming at me all the way from North Lake over Carol Col and all around the Puppet basin. Endangered.. phfff.. No more than I am..
Puppet Lk 2010 020.jpg
User avatar
rlown
Topix Junkie
 
Posts: 5328
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 5:00 pm
Location: Petaluma and Wilton, CA
Experience: Level 4 Explorer

User avatar

Re: State wildlife officials oppose protection for pika

Postby mreill14 » Mon Oct 04, 2010 6:03 am

gdurkee,
If you are still available I would love to get some information from you. I am beginning to propose a pika study and would appreciate your background information!
M
User avatar
mreill14
Topix Newbie
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 5:59 am
Experience: N/A

Previous

Return to The Campfire



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests