HST Community      Delaware North...sigh

Delaware North...sigh | High Sierra Topix  

Delaware North...sigh

Grab your bear can or camp chair, kick your feet up and chew the fat about anything Sierra Nevada related that doesn't quite fit in any of the other forums. Within reason, (and the HST rules and guidelines) this is also an anything goes forum. Tell stories, discuss wilderness issues, music, or whatever else the High Sierra stirs up in your mind.

Re: Delaware North...sigh

Postby LMBSGV » Sat Jan 10, 2015 10:08 am

From today's SF Chronicle editorial page:

Chroniclecartoon.jpg
You must register an account and login to view the files/photos attached to this post.



User avatar
LMBSGV
Topix Expert
 
Posts: 625
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 7:42 pm
Location: San Geronimo, CA
Experience: Level 4 Explorer

Re: Delaware North...sigh

Postby LMBSGV » Sun Jan 11, 2015 10:01 am

Carl Nolte's Native Son column today:

http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/nativeson ... 007165.php
User avatar
LMBSGV
Topix Expert
 
Posts: 625
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 7:42 pm
Location: San Geronimo, CA
Experience: Level 4 Explorer

Re: Delaware North...sigh

Postby rlown » Sat Jan 24, 2015 10:19 am

In related news, the greed spreads beyond California. Other concessionaires are moving that way as well (full story here): http://news.yahoo.com/whats-name-grand- ... 59143.html

FLAGSTAFF, Ariz. (AP) — To those who know and love the Grand Canyon, the names of its historic lodges are synonymous with the national park itself.

Phantom Ranch, Bright Angel Lodge, El Tovar — all bring to mind a place coveted worldwide for its sweeping views, river rapids and history told though layers of geology.

But the fate of those names is up for debate after a longtime Grand Canyon concessionaire applied to trademark them.

Approval of its bid would mean Xanterra Parks & Resorts could charge future concessionaires to use roughly 20 names of the park's most popular properties. It also could walk away with those names, leaving the iconic lodges and other facilities to adopt a new identity.

The National Park Service is weighing how to respond with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on the matter, which a spokesman described as relatively uncharted ground.

Park Service spokesman Jeff Olson said he's aware of only two other national parks where companies have registered for trademarks for names, Yosemite in California and Hot Springs in Arkansas.

"This is a new issue for us," Olson wrote in an email.

Xanterra applied for the trademarks just before its contract to manage South Rim hotels, restaurants and mule rides expired at the end of December. The company later won a temporary contract and can bid on a new one expected sometime this year.
User avatar
rlown
Topix Junkie
 
Posts: 6201
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 4:00 pm
Location: Petaluma, CA
Experience: Level 4 Explorer

Previous

Return to The Campfire



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 1 guest

cron