JPEGSnoop Sniffs Out Signs of Editing
-
Buck Forester
- Founding Member
- Posts: 452
- Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 1:38 pm
- Experience: N/A
- Location: Lincoln, CA (Sacramento area)
- Contact:
Re: JPEGSnoop Sniffs Out Signs of Editing
If I take a photo of a manipulated photo, is the new unedited photo now also manipulated?
-
ERIC
- Your Humble Host & Forums Administrator
- Posts: 3254
- Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 9:13 am
- Experience: Level 4 Explorer
- Location: between the 916 and 661
Re: JPEGSnoop Sniffs Out Signs of Editing
"Deep thoughts...by Jack Handy."Buck Forester wrote:If I take a photo of a manipulated photo, is the new unedited photo now also manipulated?
New members, please consider giving us an intro!
Follow us on Twitter @HighSierraTopix. Use hashtags #SIERRAPHILE #GotSierra? #GotMountains?
Follow us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/HighSierraTopix
Follow us on Twitter @HighSierraTopix. Use hashtags #SIERRAPHILE #GotSierra? #GotMountains?
Follow us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/HighSierraTopix
-
TehipiteTom
- Founding Member
- Posts: 953
- Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2006 8:42 am
- Experience: Level 4 Explorer
Re: JPEGSnoop Sniffs Out Signs of Editing
I had the same initial misreading and the same reaction, but figured it out after a moment.trailblazer wrote:I misread your first sentence and thought "that ain't right", until I understood your point (at least, I think I did) - I read it as they look (as in look to publish) altered imagesmarkorr wrote:BTW most scientific journals in the biology realm look for altered images. They have pretty stringent rules on how images can be manipulated and how you make it clear that its been altered. My day job is a bench scientist so I run into this a lot, both in presenting data and reviewing others.
In any case, now I have Don't Talk to Me About Love going through my head.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 50 guests