Page 2 of 2

Re: JPEGSnoop Sniffs Out Signs of Editing

Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 9:21 pm
by Buck Forester
If I take a photo of a manipulated photo, is the new unedited photo now also manipulated? :-k

Re: JPEGSnoop Sniffs Out Signs of Editing

Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 9:27 pm
by ERIC
Buck Forester wrote:If I take a photo of a manipulated photo, is the new unedited photo now also manipulated? :-k
"Deep thoughts...by Jack Handy."

Re: JPEGSnoop Sniffs Out Signs of Editing

Posted: Thu Mar 19, 2009 10:05 am
by TehipiteTom
trailblazer wrote:
markorr wrote:BTW most scientific journals in the biology realm look for altered images. They have pretty stringent rules on how images can be manipulated and how you make it clear that its been altered. My day job is a bench scientist so I run into this a lot, both in presenting data and reviewing others.
I misread your first sentence and thought "that ain't right", until I understood your point (at least, I think I did) - I read it as they look (as in look to publish) altered images :eek:
I had the same initial misreading and the same reaction, but figured it out after a moment.

In any case, now I have Don't Talk to Me About Love going through my head. ;)