Congrats Buck for piece in OP
Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 8:54 pm
Let me be the first to congratulate Buck Forester on his great piece and picture in the latest edition of Outdoor Photographer. Way to go!!!
High Sierra Topix
Sierra Nevada related information; backpacking, camping, hiking, snowboarding, skiing, fishing, photography, and more!
https://www.highsierratopix.com/community/
Congrats Buck for piece in OP
https://www.highsierratopix.com/community/viewtopic.php?t=3562
Page 1 of 1
Re: Congrats Buck for piece in OP
Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 9:32 pm
Congrats Buck!
Re: Congrats Buck for piece in OP
Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 11:29 pm
Re: Congrats Buck for piece in OP
Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2008 7:02 pm
Congratulations! 
Re: Congrats Buck for piece in OP
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 7:38 am
Most deserved...you got the magic eye
Re: Congrats Buck for piece in OP
Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2008 2:01 pm
Congratulations!
Re: Congrats Buck for piece in OP
Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2008 12:15 pm
Mr Forester it is an honor and a pleasure to know you.
Congrats on the article and awesome photo!!!
Congrats on the article and awesome photo!!!
Re: Congrats Buck for piece in OP
Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2008 1:56 pm
Congratulations Buck!!
Re: Congrats Buck for piece in OP
Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2008 4:58 pm
Congratulations, very nice photo.
Re: Congrats Buck for piece in OP
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:55 am
Hey, thanks! I just saw this (been away too long!).
One sorta funny thing in this article is that I wrote I used a B+W circular polarizer (brand name), but whoever edited the article at OP put it as "black and white circular polarizer", ha ha! Not sure what that is.
It's sorta like the editors at National Geographic Adventure magazine when they wrote in my text for my Mono Lake paddling image that I was surrounded by 15,000' peaks! It went to print that way and I asked them about it and they said the highest peak is 14,490+, which is close enough to 15,000', so they just rounded up. Well, the peaks around Mono Lake are more in the 12,000' range, but even so, that's like saying Base Camp at Mt. Everest is surrounded by 30,000' peaks. I'm not sure 'rounding up' is a good idea when it exceeds the highest peak in the entire region (or the world). But hey, I was still thankful and they corrected it in the online version.
I'm gonna start requesting to review the final edit version before publication, ha!
One sorta funny thing in this article is that I wrote I used a B+W circular polarizer (brand name), but whoever edited the article at OP put it as "black and white circular polarizer", ha ha! Not sure what that is.
It's sorta like the editors at National Geographic Adventure magazine when they wrote in my text for my Mono Lake paddling image that I was surrounded by 15,000' peaks! It went to print that way and I asked them about it and they said the highest peak is 14,490+, which is close enough to 15,000', so they just rounded up. Well, the peaks around Mono Lake are more in the 12,000' range, but even so, that's like saying Base Camp at Mt. Everest is surrounded by 30,000' peaks. I'm not sure 'rounding up' is a good idea when it exceeds the highest peak in the entire region (or the world). But hey, I was still thankful and they corrected it in the online version.
I'm gonna start requesting to review the final edit version before publication, ha!