Flickr bought by SmugMug

Topics covering photography and videography of the flora, fauna and landscape of the Sierra Nevada mountains. Show off your talent. Post your photos and videos here!
Post Reply
User avatar
zacjust32
Topix Regular
Posts: 362
Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2015 12:50 pm
Experience: Level 3 Backpacker
Location: Fresno, Ca
Contact:

Flickr bought by SmugMug

Post by zacjust32 »

One of the first and best-known photo-sharing services, Flickr, has been bought by the independent image-hosting firm SmugMug, as Verizon begins the breakup of Yahoo.

The deal, terms of which have not been disclosed, sees Flickr – with its tens of billions of photos and 75 million users – become part of a similar family-run service in SmugMug.

The Silicon Valley firm, founded by a father and son team in 2002 without the help of venture capital or outside investment, says it intends for Flickr to “continue to operate separately, just as it has been”. SmugMug said no changes would be made to Flickr’s current plans or rates: “Flickr’s free accounts are foundational to its community of influential and engaged photographers.”

Don MacAskill, the SmugMug chief executive, told USA today “Flickr has survived through thick and thin and is core to the entire fabric of the internet.

“It’s a fantastic product and a beloved brand, supplying tens of billions of photos to hundreds of millions of people around the world.”

MacAskill pledged to invest in Flickr and restore it to its former glory. SmugMug intends to migrate Flickr’s back-end infrastructure over to its technology, but maintain the pioneering social photo-sharing service as a separate entity and site. Flickr’s user and photo numbers are thought to dwarf those of SmugMug.

Flickr was started in 2004 and acquired by Yahoo in 2005 for approximately $25m (£18m). The site proved popular with both professional and amateur photographers, forming a central role in the cultural life of the internet, hosting 6bn photos by 2011 and 87 million registered users by 2013.

But Yahoo failed to invest in Flickr, leading it to miss the boat on smartphone photography and the rise of Facebook and Instagram. After a series of cost savings and layoffs at the firm, Flickr was given a brief reprieve in 2012 when Marissa Mayer took the helm of Yahoo, giving users 1TB of storage for free and an overhaul of its user interface. But by then too much ground had been lost to Facebook businesses.

Verizon bought the ailing yahoo for $4.8bn in 2016 leaving many of its most dedicated users, who had collectively uploaded 12.4bn photos, fearful of the future. Verizon began cutting costs and selling off parts of its Yahoo and AOL combined business, renamed Oath, at the start of 2018, including Moviefone and the e-commerce firm Polyvore.

The SmugMug acquisition puts to bed rumours of Flickr’s imminent demise at the hands of Oath cost savings.
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/ ... oo-breakup
User avatar
rightstar76
Topix Expert
Posts: 776
Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2006 3:22 pm
Experience: N/A

Re: Flickr bought by SmugMug

Post by rightstar76 »

Good news to Flickr users. Also, good that it's family owned rather than by a corporation. This will probably get them a bunch of business on the Smugmug side.
User avatar
Eiprahs
Topix Regular
Posts: 112
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 7:12 pm
Experience: Level 1 Hiker
Location: Mount Angel, Oregon
Contact:

Re: Flickr bought by SmugMug

Post by Eiprahs »

I like Flickr and am glad to hear it will not follow Photobucket down the subscription path.
Dave
User avatar
fishmonger
Topix Fanatic
Posts: 1250
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 10:27 am
Experience: Level 4 Explorer
Location: Madison, WI
Contact:

Re: Flickr bought by SmugMug

Post by fishmonger »

the biggest obstacle for SmugMug will be the running storage costs of Flickr. I don't think Flickr on its own was profitable, and reading the past blogs on SmugMug shows that even though that was always a for-pay service, storage is a huge factor in their running costs. I wouldn't be surprised if changes to the business model of the free accounts will get implemented to control those costs, or policy changes as to expiring content that has no views for n-months, etc. Where I work the subject is video and storage growth is a huge problem, so much that services are phased out that work perfectly fine, only because a transfer to another video hosting solution will purge 80 percent of the old content.

I have had my stuff on flickr because it's a decent photo sharing place and free. SmugMug is a great hosting site, but there's no social connection at all. Wasn't worth the cost to me unless I was going to step it up to a commercial site and sell prints. There may be some convergence of what SmugMug's pro accounts offer with Flicker, where currently you get better stats, not much else for your Flickr Pro subscription.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 20 guests