Anything new with Ursack approval? | High Sierra Topix  

Anything new with Ursack approval?

Share your advice and personal experiences, post a gear review or ask any questions you may have pertaining to outdoor gear and equipment.

Anything new with Ursack approval?

Postby Pachystima » Mon Mar 18, 2013 3:32 pm

I'm hiking the JMT in Aug./Sept. and would prefer to carry my 8 oz Ursack to my 39 oz BV-500. Is there anything new on the Ursack approval quest?

User avatar
Topix Novice
Posts: 9
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2013 11:03 am
Experience: N/A

Re: Anything new with Ursack approval?

Postby oldranger » Mon Mar 18, 2013 4:29 pm


No loosening of restrictions. And weight savings for other areas not as much as between the base weight of ursack and the hard sided containers because if you just use the sack without the aluminum insert a bear can still destroy your food (oh and SEKI requires, as I understand it, that you counterbalance whether using the insert or not). With the ursack without the insert you must still counterbalance and if you are going to do that why use a heavy ursack bag when a silnylon bag of similar volume will weigh a little over an ounce?


Who can't do everything he used to and what he can do takes a hell of a lot longer!
User avatar
Topix Junkie
Posts: 2491
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 9:18 pm
Location: Bend, Oregon
Experience: N/A

Return to Outdoor Gear Topix

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests