Re: Bearikade or Ursack
Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2011 9:03 am
rlown- I am glad there is no uniform state-wide poilcy. Bear cannisters should only be required where they are actually needed. Although expensive, I have solved this problem by having both a Ursack and Bearikade. Sometimes I use one, sometimes the other, and sometimes both! I draw the line at carrying TWO cannisters- on very long trips I put excess food and bulky food and smelly non-food items in the Ursack. Wouldn't it be great if there were "bear can pick up and drop off" stations along trails. You come to a bear can area - swipe your credit card (on a solar powered reader), out pops a bear can (like a big vending machine), you use it, when out of the area- drop the can in a slot, swipe your card and go on your way. (I know there are lots of practical problems with this concept, but you get the idea).
The non-uniform policy that I find annoying is that regulations are "dropped" or ignored for thru-hikers. If a can is needed, it is needed by everyone!
I would also like to see a lot more research happening on inventing a better bear-proof container. There sure is a lack of choice right now and all are expensive because the development and testing is so difficult for small manufacturers. Certainly some bright person could figure out something better than the rigid, heavy, hard-sided container concept.
The non-uniform policy that I find annoying is that regulations are "dropped" or ignored for thru-hikers. If a can is needed, it is needed by everyone!
I would also like to see a lot more research happening on inventing a better bear-proof container. There sure is a lack of choice right now and all are expensive because the development and testing is so difficult for small manufacturers. Certainly some bright person could figure out something better than the rigid, heavy, hard-sided container concept.