Ursack approved in Inyo Forest? | High Sierra Topix  

Ursack approved in Inyo Forest?

Share your advice and personal experiences, post a gear review or ask any questions you may have pertaining to outdoor gear and equipment.
User avatar

Re: Ursack approved in Inyo Forest?

Postby AlmostThere » Fri Feb 21, 2014 8:02 am

Snowtrout wrote:
I think collapsible or pieces that break down for carrying is possible if designed right. For example, this product that has yet to be released might have potential: http://www.camp4outdoors.com/products.html



I think those are the folks that sent me a questionnaire about features of bear canisters.

I don't like that there are fiddly little latches. Every piece of gear I've ever used with fiddly bits gets clogged, jammed or broken eventually. Not too sure the round shape is a good idea.



User avatar
AlmostThere
Topix Fanatic
 
Posts: 1766
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 4:38 pm
Experience: N/A

User avatar

Re: Ursack approved in Inyo Forest?

Postby Snowtrout » Fri Feb 21, 2014 12:03 pm

I have also wondered why it was at an outdoor trade show a few years ago but as of yet, not released. Getting certification might be the sticking point. But I think they are trying to address issues most, including myself, have with current canisters: the weight and size of them. Being able to split the canister in half allows two people to share the weight of the canister and splitting it makes a flat surface, making it easier to put in ones pack. Good for partners or groups but no real advantage for soloist that have a present canister.

I just like the idea that companies are thinking outside of the box and coming up with new ideas.

A question though for those that have an Ursack. I have often thought that having a single attach point allows bears to mouth, pull, and move the bag (creating a tether ball effect) could possibly allow them to get better leverage on the sack, leading to a failure. Would adding a second attach/anchor point at the bottom of the sack (preventing the tether ball effect) be a improvement over the present design?
User avatar
Snowtrout
Topix Regular
 
Posts: 148
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2013 10:06 pm
Location: Fresno, CA
Experience: Level 3 Backpacker

User avatar

Ursack approved in Inyo Forest?

Postby wanderin.jack » Fri Feb 21, 2014 10:42 pm

Hum, same problem as with the URSACK. Makes a poor stool.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Wanderin' Jack
User avatar
wanderin.jack
Topix Acquainted
 
Posts: 73
Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2013 4:21 pm
Experience: N/A

User avatar

Re: Ursack approved in Inyo Forest?

Postby JWreno » Tue Feb 25, 2014 11:00 am

We have 3 Bearikade expeditions and a weekender and haven't worried about a bear in years. We used to hang food in the 1990s and lose sleep keeping the bears away. We get a lot of use out of the containers when doing the laundry or doing a body wipe bath away from any stream. The cost is reasonable when you buy them and use them year after year. They also make nice camp stools. I have one Ursack that I used for a few trips as an overflow food storage solution. We have gotten much better at doing our own home dried food and no longer have the bulk of freeze dried food so space isn't a problem.
User avatar
JWreno
Topix Regular
 
Posts: 171
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 9:55 am
Location: Reno
Experience: Level 3 Backpacker

Previous

Return to Outdoor Gear Topix



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests