Re: Regarding some rare routes and regions
Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2012 3:20 pm
Now, regarding you initial inquiry- for what its worth, I skied virtually that exact same line in the Ritter Range back in '85. My memory is quite vague on the specifics, but I keep pretty accurate journals and very accurate maps. The only real differences I see is that we stayed higher crossing the Shellenbarger Spur dropping only slightly on a nw traverse, then turning the corner of a sub-spur into the small pond shown on your map. From that pond we traversed due north to the ponds at the head of Dike Creek.
From there we traversed west climbing very little to cross the Dike/Slide Divide. From there north to a crossing of "Glacier Spur" where you show it on your map. I do believe we had to poke around a bit to find a good way through there. Be advised that this is very remote, deep, dark, loose territory.
Earlier that same trip, I crossed the Glacier Spur east of your location (east of peak 12,344 on the 15'). That required a short bit of 3rd class on the south, but dumps you on the glacier with smooth sailing over to Lake Catherine.
Also on my map I indicate that the pass even further east (right next to the Ritter Range crest) may be an easier though un-tried, alternative.
All these photos are on film, Kodachrome no less!
I hope this helps you out.
John
From there we traversed west climbing very little to cross the Dike/Slide Divide. From there north to a crossing of "Glacier Spur" where you show it on your map. I do believe we had to poke around a bit to find a good way through there. Be advised that this is very remote, deep, dark, loose territory.
Earlier that same trip, I crossed the Glacier Spur east of your location (east of peak 12,344 on the 15'). That required a short bit of 3rd class on the south, but dumps you on the glacier with smooth sailing over to Lake Catherine.
Also on my map I indicate that the pass even further east (right next to the Ritter Range crest) may be an easier though un-tried, alternative.
All these photos are on film, Kodachrome no less!
I hope this helps you out.
John