Finding the Floyd Otter Tree - #3 Giant Sequoia | High Sierra Topix  

Finding the Floyd Otter Tree - #3 Giant Sequoia

If you've been searching for the best source of information and stimulating discussion related to Spring/Summer/Fall backpacking, hiking and camping in the Sierra Nevada...look no further!
User avatar

Re: Finding the Floyd Otter Tree - #3 Giant Sequoia

Postby maverick » Fri Aug 03, 2012 9:48 pm

Welcome to HST Hardscrabble! Thank you for the information you provided to this thread.
HST= Wilderness Adventurer who knows no bounds, except for their own imagination.

Have a safer backcountry experience by using the HST ReConn Form 2.0, named after Larry Conn, a HST member: http://reconn.org



User avatar
maverick
Forums Moderator
Forums Moderator
 
Posts: 8028
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 5:54 pm
Experience: Level 4 Explorer

User avatar

Re: Finding the Floyd Otter Tree - #3 Giant Sequoia

Postby AfterSeven » Mon Aug 06, 2012 12:31 pm

Hi Hardscrabble, Welcome aboard!

What was the ground perimeter height and volume... and diameter at 60/120/180 that you came up with? Did you ever issue a press release? How did you deal with Giant Burns down below in your calculations? Why doesn't the park service acknowledge the tree as #3 or even list it...if you know?

There was a tree listed in Dept of Interior reports from 1900 - 1925 as the "California Tree" in the Garfield Grove with a 30' diameter (presumably at ground level) and 260' high... did you see any sign that this tree had been recognized by previous generations...(Trail Proximity, Plaque Mounts, Carvings in the trunk?)

I'll be sure to check it out when it cools down a bit on the South Fork.

How did you do with the search for the Phantom? Did you end up checking out the large trees of Homers Nose, Board Camp, South Fork and Eden Creek? If so were there any approaches to these groves you found favorable or any approaches you would advise against at all costs? how'd you deal with the low elevation walls of poison oak?

Sorry for all the questions...Cheers!
A7
Enthusiasm is the burning spirit within that says, ‘I can!’ It is the indomitable ‘Yes!’ without which nothing worthwhile is ever accomplished. ~ ROYAL ROBBINS
User avatar
AfterSeven
Topix Acquainted
 
Posts: 25
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 10:04 pm
Location: California
Experience: N/A

User avatar

Re: Finding the Floyd Otter Tree - #3 Giant Sequoia

Postby sparky » Mon Aug 06, 2012 8:42 pm

I have a pretty good idea why this tree is a mystery, and I think it is better that way. :nod:
There is a million ways to be human, all are worthwhile.

True happiness is the absence of striving for happiness.
-Chuang Tzu.
User avatar
sparky
Topix Expert
 
Posts: 880
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 10:01 am
Experience: N/A

User avatar

Re: Finding the Floyd Otter Tree - #3 Giant Sequoia

Postby Hardscrabble » Wed Aug 15, 2012 5:25 pm

In answer to Afterseven's questions, the burn was taken care of by treating the lowest cross section of the tree as an ellipse, tapering to a circle at the first break. We had a diameter measured with the theodolite across the tree on the contour & a circumference measured with a tape. It was not a circle. I am more concerned about how to handle the butresses between the upper ground level & the lower ground level. I did the best I could with what I had at the time. I would like to repeat the measurements with someone who is familiar with measuring trees. I didn't take diameters at any specific heights but tried to see where the taper changed slope.

I sent a copy of my calcs to Nate Stevenson at the park & will send them to you if you will get me your e-mail address. call 287-2399.

I found no evidence of previous work around the tree.

We came in from Mt. Home, up the Wishon fork of the Tule to Tuohy Gap & then along Dennison ridge to the saddle & then down to the tree. There is an old trail from Touhy Gap west & down to the South fork (Kaweah) Ranger Station but we missed it along the ridge because we were too high. We didn't find any poison oak until we got way down to the Kaweah, but avoided it by staying on the trail. I have some better info on the old Dennison Trail if you intend to go that way.

Hardscrabble
User avatar
Hardscrabble
Topix Newbie
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2012 8:29 pm
Experience: N/A

User avatar

Re: Finding the Floyd Otter Tree - #3 Giant Sequoia

Postby ERIC » Wed Aug 29, 2012 7:44 am

http://www.californiareport.org/archive/R201208290850/b

Good exposure, and good interview. Assuming that was you, lambertiana? :)
New members, please consider giving us an intro!
Follow us on Twitter @HighSierraTopix. Use hashtags #SIERRAPHILE #GotSierra? #GotMountains?
Follow us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/HighSierraTopix
User avatar
ERIC
Your Humble Host & Forums Administrator
Your Humble Host & Forums Administrator
 
Posts: 2909
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 9:13 am
Location: between the 916 and 661
Experience: Level 4 Explorer

User avatar

Re: Finding the Floyd Otter Tree - #3 Giant Sequoia

Postby lambertiana » Wed Aug 29, 2012 7:53 pm

No, that wasn't me.
User avatar
lambertiana
Topix Regular
 
Posts: 159
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 3:13 pm
Location: Visalia, CA
Experience: N/A

User avatar

Re: Finding the Floyd Otter Tree - #3 Giant Sequoia

Postby ERIC » Wed Aug 29, 2012 9:31 pm

Whoops, sorry. But wow, quite the coincidence....scout groups, hidden Sequoia groves...the timing of this thread vs. the NPR piece.... Hopefully you at least see what might have prompted me to try to make that connection.. :D
New members, please consider giving us an intro!
Follow us on Twitter @HighSierraTopix. Use hashtags #SIERRAPHILE #GotSierra? #GotMountains?
Follow us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/HighSierraTopix
User avatar
ERIC
Your Humble Host & Forums Administrator
Your Humble Host & Forums Administrator
 
Posts: 2909
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 9:13 am
Location: between the 916 and 661
Experience: Level 4 Explorer

User avatar

Re: Finding the Floyd Otter Tree - #3 Giant Sequoia

Postby Hetch Hetchy 1900 » Thu Sep 20, 2012 10:42 pm

I have seen the references to the "California Tree" in the Garfield Grove in old Interior Department documents. It very well may be the same tree as the Floyd Otter Tree, but who knows for sure?! As I remember, the government documents referred to the "California Tree" as the largest tree in the Garfield Grove. Given that back in those days, more emphasis was placed on base diameter as opposed to calculated volume when determining the relative size of trees, the California Tree and the Otter Tree may very well be the same tree since the photos of the Otter Tree show a large basal swell.

I also wonder why the Park Service does not at least add the Otter Tree to their top ten list, especially when it may be as high as number 3 on the list!

AfterSeven wrote:Hi Hardscrabble, Welcome aboard!

What was the ground perimeter height and volume... and diameter at 60/120/180 that you came up with? Did you ever issue a press release? How did you deal with Giant Burns down below in your calculations? Why doesn't the park service acknowledge the tree as #3 or even list it...if you know?

There was a tree listed in Dept of Interior reports from 1900 - 1925 as the "California Tree" in the Garfield Grove with a 30' diameter (presumably at ground level) and 260' high... did you see any sign that this tree had been recognized by previous generations...(Trail Proximity, Plaque Mounts, Carvings in the trunk?)

I'll be sure to check it out when it cools down a bit on the South Fork.

How did you do with the search for the Phantom? Did you end up checking out the large trees of Homers Nose, Board Camp, South Fork and Eden Creek? If so were there any approaches to these groves you found favorable or any approaches you would advise against at all costs? how'd you deal with the low elevation walls of poison oak?

Sorry for all the questions...Cheers!
A7
User avatar
Hetch Hetchy 1900
Topix Newbie
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2012 10:14 pm
Experience: N/A

Previous

Return to Backpacking / Hiking / Camping



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bkoenig, kursavwilage and 10 guests