Page 1 of 2

High trailheads - 10,000'

Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2011 11:15 pm
by East Side Hiker
As I've grown older, I've gravitated to higher trailheads. As a kid, we would deliberately hike the bad trails - like Cotonwood Creek from the valley bottom to the trailhead, then go over New Army Pass into the NP.

Now, being almost 60, and photography being my focus (acutally phenology is my interest), I gravite to the high places. The places like on the Tioga Crest where there are micro-gardens of many species in small colonies (**** of a climb); or Mt. Dana where micro-gardens are scatered among clumps of sky pilot in uncomprehesible rock piles; with small weadows of alpine columbine and Delphinium widely scattered about the trail.

In the Sierra there's just a few places that one can drive to about 10,000' or above. And easily get into the alpine.

Sonora Pass is just shy of 10,000, but I'll count it. Tioga Pass, also just shy, but it counts because I climb Dana every year for the past 12 or so years. Saddlebag Lake (because I explore Tioga Creast every year). Horseshoe Mdw. Mosquito Flat. Virginia Lakes. Mt Rose, though not nearly 10,000', is similar habitat. And there's the White Mtns, not in the Sierra.

Those are the places to go for me.

.

Re: High trailheads - 10,000'

Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 2:12 pm
by The Other Tom
Phenolgoy.....I had to look that one up. Thanks for posting this list. It's good to know for us non locals.

Re: High trailheads - 10,000'

Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 1:01 pm
by tim
Here's a few photos from Rock Creek last Thursday (April 21). The road is plowed to the pack station (9850ft) - its about 4-5 feet deep at that point. We went sledding with the kids rather than hiking, but the snow is reasonably consolidated in most places. The lake had a small patch of open water (right side of photo).

On the East side (Bishop to Mono Lake) the snow level is about 8000ft at the moment (down to ~7500ft in trees/shade). Coming over Carson Pass on the way back the snow was solid down to 6000ft on the West side and very deep high up (20-30ft drifts on Carson Spur).
Rock Creek road.jpg
Rock Creek pack station.jpg
Rock Creek lake.jpg

Re: High trailheads - 10,000'

Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 1:04 pm
by rlown
a great perspective about now..

Re: High trailheads - 10,000'

Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 1:28 pm
by oldranger
Interesting! I was just getting ready to post about the snow sensor data for Cottonwood lakes at over 10,000 feet but further s. Only 18" of water with water content dropping about .5" per day. Depending on road conditions Cottonwood lakes could be a Memorial Day destination. Here is the url:

Mike

Re: High trailheads - 10,000'

Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 1:44 pm
by maverick
Thanks Tim for posting these photo's and the 411, it sure shows us what things look
like at these elevations, at least in this particular area.
Cool to see Rock Creek Lake still snow covered.

Re: High trailheads - 10,000'

Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 2:50 pm
by tim
We drove all the way up the Sierra (as our trip was to Death Valley) - southern destinations are much clearer of snow. The Cottonwood road was basically clear of snow up to the top of the switchbacks that you can see from Lone Pine. Olancha Peak snow level was ~10K feet, Owens Peak (8500ft) completely clear. Southern Sierra may well be a decent destination for Memorial Day. On the other hand the White Mountains were very white...

Re: High trailheads - 10,000'

Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 2:59 pm
by maverick
Tim,

How about a TR on your trip to DV in the "Beyond The Sierra Nevada" section.

Re: High trailheads - 10,000'

Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 8:15 pm
by tim
Sadly it wasn't a backpacking trip, but we did see some great flower displays
Wildrose canyon.jpg
Ridgecrest flowers.jpg

Re: High trailheads - 10,000'

Posted: Tue Apr 26, 2011 4:28 pm
by quentinc
Mike, thanks for posting the Cottonwood link. That's the most encouraging thing I've seen about the Sierra this year! I've been sort of resigning myself to backpacking in the San Bernardino mountains in June, but maybe I won't have to.